Mid-Range Workstation GPU Shootout : FireGL V5600 vs. QuadroFX 1700 vs. FireGL V3600
by
Chris Connolly
—
Tuesday, February 05, 2008, 12:00 PM EDT
-
Page 9:
GPGPU Computing
-
Page 1: Introduction and Specifications
-
Page 2: Nvidia QuadroFX 1700
-
Page 3: ATI FireGL V5600 and V3600
-
Page 4: Power Consumption
-
Page 5: Testbed and Cinebench
-
Page 6: 3D Studio Max 2008 and Maya 8.5
-
Page 7: Spec ViewPerf 10
-
Page 8: Spec ViewPerf 10 (Continued)
-
Page 10: GPGPU Computing (Continued)
-
Page 11: 3DMark06 and Crysis
-
Page 12: OpenGL Effect Benchmarks
-
Page 13: Conclusion
-
![]() |
|



Our first set of GPGPU tests on these mid-range cards look good for ATI’s product line, as they sweep the benchmark charts. All three tests ran faster on both the FireGL V5600 and the V3600 compared to the QuadroFX 1700. The final, most intensive test, failed to run on either the QuadroFX 1700 or the FireGL V3600 card. Performance scaling looks about as expected given the hardware and price points of these cards.
Related content
TOP STORIES
Which New GPU Is For You?
KEEP INFORMED
Stay updated with the latest news and updates. Subscribe to our newsletter!
Subscribe Now