Mid-Range Workstation GPU Shootout : FireGL V5600 vs. QuadroFX 1700 vs. FireGL V3600
by
Chris Connolly
—
Tuesday, February 05, 2008, 12:00 PM EDT
-
Page 10:
GPGPU Computing (Continued)
-
Page 1: Introduction and Specifications
-
Page 2: Nvidia QuadroFX 1700
-
Page 3: ATI FireGL V5600 and V3600
-
Page 4: Power Consumption
-
Page 5: Testbed and Cinebench
-
Page 6: 3D Studio Max 2008 and Maya 8.5
-
Page 7: Spec ViewPerf 10
-
Page 8: Spec ViewPerf 10 (Continued)
-
Page 9: GPGPU Computing
-
Page 11: 3DMark06 and Crysis
-
Page 12: OpenGL Effect Benchmarks
-
Page 13: Conclusion
-
|



Our second round of GPGPU benchmarks is a much closer race. In our Monte Carlo tests, the QuadroFX 1700 and FireGL V5600 are fairly neck and neck throughout the suite, although the QuadroFX 1700 retains a slight performance edge. A nice win for the QuadroFX 1700, although given it’s a bit more expensive, the price/performance ratio is still slightly in ATI’s favor.
Related content
TOP STORIES
Which New GPU Is For You?
KEEP INFORMED
Stay updated with the latest news and updates. Subscribe to our newsletter!
Subscribe Now