Mid-Range Workstation GPU Shootout : FireGL V5600 vs. QuadroFX 1700 vs. FireGL V3600
by
Chris Connolly
—
Tuesday, February 05, 2008, 12:00 PM EDT
-
Page 10:
GPGPU Computing (Continued)
-
Page 1: Introduction and Specifications
-
Page 2: Nvidia QuadroFX 1700
-
Page 3: ATI FireGL V5600 and V3600
-
Page 4: Power Consumption
-
Page 5: Testbed and Cinebench
-
Page 6: 3D Studio Max 2008 and Maya 8.5
-
Page 7: Spec ViewPerf 10
-
Page 8: Spec ViewPerf 10 (Continued)
-
Page 9: GPGPU Computing
-
Page 11: 3DMark06 and Crysis
-
Page 12: OpenGL Effect Benchmarks
-
Page 13: Conclusion
-
![]() |
|



Our second round of GPGPU benchmarks is a much closer race. In our Monte Carlo tests, the QuadroFX 1700 and FireGL V5600 are fairly neck and neck throughout the suite, although the QuadroFX 1700 retains a slight performance edge. A nice win for the QuadroFX 1700, although given it’s a bit more expensive, the price/performance ratio is still slightly in ATI’s favor.