LG Wing Review: A Solid 5G Phone With A Wild Twist
Verizon mmWave 5G cell site in San Francisco
And yeah, it’s crazy fast -- as long as you’re standing outdoors within line-of-sight (about 750 feet) of a cell site, that is. While the Wing checks every box when it comes to 5G networking, it lacks stereo speakers or a headphone jack. The mono speaker sounds decent enough, but doesn’t really stand out. At least there’s support for digital audio devices via USB Type-C, plus aptX HD lossless audio over Bluetooth.
LG Wing Performance
When it comes to performance, the LG
Wing closely matches the LG Velvet, and you can see this in our
benchmarks. This makes sense, since both devices use Qualcomm’s
Snapdragon 765G SoC. Here, it’s paired with 8GB RAM and 256GB of
UFS 2.1 storage (128GB in some markets), plus microSD support up
to 2TB. Basically, it’s as quick as other Snapdragon 765G phones
we’ve reviewed, with the exception of the OnePlus Nord.
The Wing handled our usual suite of productivity apps without breaking a sweat. But while it’s responsive enough, there’s room for improvement -- the 60Hz refresh rate certainly doesn't feel as smooth as the 90/120Hz competition. Some of LG’s animations are slow, especially when deploying or stowing the main screen. Overall though, we have no complaints. This handset is speedy enough to satisfy most people.
The Wing handled our usual suite of productivity apps without breaking a sweat. But while it’s responsive enough, there’s room for improvement -- the 60Hz refresh rate certainly doesn't feel as smooth as the 90/120Hz competition. Some of LG’s animations are slow, especially when deploying or stowing the main screen. Overall though, we have no complaints. This handset is speedy enough to satisfy most people.
 |
|
In these Geekbench 5 tests, the Wing finishes in the lower third. The iPhone 11 Pro still has the strongest single-core performance overall, but the Wing hangs with other Snapdragon 765G-equipped devices like the original OnePlus Nord and LG Velvet.
|
|
Futuremark's PCMark for Android
is an excellent suite of tests if you want to benchmark a
wide range of tasks on any handset -- things like image and
video editing, as well as lighter-duty, everyday workloads
such as email and web browsing. When you see the test
running live, it's clear the scripted application tests are
carefully selected and tuned to make use of the each mobile
platform in a very controlled way...
We were expecting the Wing to score close to the OnePlus
Nord, but for some reason -- and like the Velvet -- it scores
just below the Snapdragon 730G-equipped Pixel 4a. While the
Snapdragon 765G powering the Wing clearly doesn't match the
performance of current flagships for the workloads used in
PCMark for Android, these results are still respectable.
|
|
AnTuTu’s latest benchmark
returns a number of metrics ranked with somewhat nebulous
scores, rather than frame rates or time to complete. Here
we're running the latest version of AnTuTu across an
multiple Android devices. AnTuTu returns four top level
performance results which are all included here: CPU, RAM,
3D, UX (or User Experience), along with a total score...
The Wing did better with the
AnTuTu benchmark. Here, it slots right in-between the Pixel 5 and Velvet and the Snapdragon
765G-equipped OnePlus Nord.
AITuTu evaluates the AI performance of a device by leveraging two mainstream neural network models for machine learning and AI -- Inception v3 for Image Classification and MobileNet-SSD for Object Detection. The benchmark determines the device’s accuracy and speed when inferring data from each workload...
AITuTu evaluates the AI performance of a device by leveraging two mainstream neural network models for machine learning and AI -- Inception v3 for Image Classification and MobileNet-SSD for Object Detection. The benchmark determines the device’s accuracy and speed when inferring data from each workload...
 |
|
Next we're checking how the Wing
compares in GFXBench, which has been one of the standard mobile
graphics/gaming performance benchmarks for years. To ensure that
display refresh (v-sync) and resolution aren't limiting factors,
we're comparing off-screen test results here. GFXBench tests
OpenGL ES graphics workloads and we're specifically testing
OpenGL ES 3.0 and 2.0...
Graphics performance clearly isn't the Snapdragon 765G's strongest suit. Here, the Wing's scores are almost identical to the OnePlus Nord's and consistently slightly less than half the scores of current flagships.
Futuremark's 3DMark Sling Shot is a newer benchmark module that's been added to the 3DMark mobile suite. Unlike previous gen 3DMark mobile tests, Sling Shot is a much more advanced OpenGL ES 3.1 and Metal API-based benchmark that employs more advanced rendering techniques, like volumetric lighting, particle illumination, multiple render targets, instanced rendering, uniform buffers and transform feedback.
Futuremark's 3DMark Sling Shot is a newer benchmark module that's been added to the 3DMark mobile suite. Unlike previous gen 3DMark mobile tests, Sling Shot is a much more advanced OpenGL ES 3.1 and Metal API-based benchmark that employs more advanced rendering techniques, like volumetric lighting, particle illumination, multiple render targets, instanced rendering, uniform buffers and transform feedback.
Futuremark 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme Benchmark
We're running this test in off-screen mode once again to remove display resolution differences from the equation. This lets us compare cross-platform results more reliably...
Like the OnePlus Nord, the Wing also performed worse than current flagships in these 3DMark tests. It scored about half what the Snapdragon 855-equipped Pixel 4 XL scored, but still 1.3x better than the Snapdragon 730G-equipped Pixel 4a.
LG Wing Other Features And Battery Life
Other specs include CAT 18 LTE, WiFi 5
(802.11ac), Bluetooth 5.1 (LE), NFC, and dual-band A-GPS/
GLONASS / Galileo / BDS, plus the standard roster of sensors
(proximity, ambient light, accelerometer, gyroscope, compass,
and barometer). Haptics are pretty good, but we doubt LG is
using a linear vibration motor here. The optical in-display
fingerprint sensor is fast and reliable, but the Wing lacks
face unlock.
Battery life is fantastic. The Wing lasted 15 hours and 45 minutes in our PCMark battery test, which is truly impressive for a 4000mAh cell. Obviously the Snapdragon 765G is very efficient, and the 60Hz refresh rate also helps. When you’re ready to fill up, the Wing supports fast charging up to 25W (Quick Charge 4.0+ and PD 2.0) and Qi-compatible wireless charging. It ships with a 25W charger in the box.
Next up: the software, pricing, and our review verdict...
