Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro, Watchband Hinge And Intel Core M Deliver Thin And Light Performance
by
Dave Altavilla
—
Wednesday, November 26, 2014, 09:29 AM EDT
-
Page 6:
Lame MT And Cinebench
-
Page 1: Introduction and Specifications
-
Page 2: Design and Build Quality
-
Page 3: Design And Yoga Modes (cont.)
-
Page 4: Utilities And Software
-
Page 5: SANDRA And Sunspider
-
Page 7: PCMark 8 v2
-
Page 8: 3DMark And Far Cry 2
-
Page 9: HD Video Playback and Battery Life
-
Page 10: Performance Summary and Conclusion
-
![]() |
|
For this test, we created our own 223MB WAV file (a hallucinogenically-induced Grateful Dead jam) and converted it to the MP3 format using the multi-thread capable LAME MT application, in both single and multi-thread modes. Processing times are recorded below, listed in seconds. Shorter times equate to better performance.

Here the Yoga 3 Pro trails, just barely falling behind Core i5-4200U and 4300U-powered machines in multithread performance, though its single-thread performance is strong. It's indicative of the better IPC throughput of Intel's new architecture. Regardless, clock-for-clock a Core M 5Y70 is showing itself to be on par with the Core i5-4200U at this point in our testing.
![]() |
|

Cinebench, on the other hand, tells a different story. The Core M 5Y70, in terms of CPU performance, is out-classed by all but the Pentium N3530 chip in Dell's budget Inspiron 11 machine. With respect to OpenGL graphics rendering performance, however, the Yoga 3 Pro and its Core M chip hold their own in the top quadrant of performance.
Related content
TOP STORIES
Which New GPU Is For You?
KEEP INFORMED
Stay updated with the latest news and updates. Subscribe to our newsletter!
Subscribe Now