High-End Workstation Graphics Shootout - AMD FireGL V8650 Vs. NVIDIA QuadroFX 5600
by
Chris Connolly
—
Monday, January 21, 2008, 08:00 PM EDT
-
Page 8:
SPEC ViewPerf 10
-
Page 1: Introduction
-
Page 2: Specifications
-
Page 3: ATI FireGL V8650
-
Page 4: NVIDIA QuadroFX 5600
-
Page 5: Heat, Noise, and Power Consumption
-
Page 6: Testbed and Cinebench
-
Page 7: 3D Studio Max 2008 and Maya 8.5
-
Page 9: SPEC ViewPerf 10 (Continued)
-
Page 10: SPEC ViewPerf 10 (FSAA Tests)
-
Page 11: GPGPU Computing
-
Page 12: GPGPU Computing (Continued)
-
Page 13: Gaming Performance
-
Page 14: OpenGL Effect Benchmarks
-
Page 15: Conclusion
-
|
Our first set of Viewperf 10 numbers look fairly mixed between our three high-end cards. For these tests, the extra memory capacities of these cards don’t make a huge difference, as seen by the architecturally similar V7600 and V8650 pushing very similar numbers.
The QuadroFX 5600 puts up solid results, especially in Catia, where it has a solid lead over the ATI cards. ATI’s FireGL V8650 does put up the best performance in the all-important Maya benchmark, which coincides with the Maya benchmarks we ran prior.