High-End Workstation Graphics Shootout - AMD FireGL V8650 Vs. NVIDIA QuadroFX 5600
by
Chris Connolly
—
Monday, January 21, 2008, 08:00 PM EDT
-
Page 8:
SPEC ViewPerf 10
-
Page 1: Introduction
-
Page 2: Specifications
-
Page 3: ATI FireGL V8650
-
Page 4: NVIDIA QuadroFX 5600
-
Page 5: Heat, Noise, and Power Consumption
-
Page 6: Testbed and Cinebench
-
Page 7: 3D Studio Max 2008 and Maya 8.5
-
Page 9: SPEC ViewPerf 10 (Continued)
-
Page 10: SPEC ViewPerf 10 (FSAA Tests)
-
Page 11: GPGPU Computing
-
Page 12: GPGPU Computing (Continued)
-
Page 13: Gaming Performance
-
Page 14: OpenGL Effect Benchmarks
-
Page 15: Conclusion
-
|




Our first set of Viewperf 10 numbers look fairly mixed between our three high-end cards. For these tests, the extra memory capacities of these cards don’t make a huge difference, as seen by the architecturally similar V7600 and V8650 pushing very similar numbers.
The QuadroFX 5600 puts up solid results, especially in Catia, where it has a solid lead over the ATI cards. ATI’s FireGL V8650 does put up the best performance in the all-important Maya benchmark, which coincides with the Maya benchmarks we ran prior.
Related content
TOP STORIES
Which New GPU Is For You?
KEEP INFORMED
Stay updated with the latest news and updates. Subscribe to our newsletter!
Subscribe Now