High-End Workstation Graphics Shootout - AMD FireGL V8650 Vs. NVIDIA QuadroFX 5600
by
Chris Connolly
—
Monday, January 21, 2008, 08:00 PM EDT
-
Page 10:
SPEC ViewPerf 10 (FSAA Tests)
-
Page 1: Introduction
-
Page 2: Specifications
-
Page 3: ATI FireGL V8650
-
Page 4: NVIDIA QuadroFX 5600
-
Page 5: Heat, Noise, and Power Consumption
-
Page 6: Testbed and Cinebench
-
Page 7: 3D Studio Max 2008 and Maya 8.5
-
Page 8: SPEC ViewPerf 10
-
Page 9: SPEC ViewPerf 10 (Continued)
-
Page 11: GPGPU Computing
-
Page 12: GPGPU Computing (Continued)
-
Page 13: Gaming Performance
-
Page 14: OpenGL Effect Benchmarks
-
Page 15: Conclusion
-
|



In most cases, the performance charts don’t change that much when FSAA gets into the mix. We only tested 0x/4x/8x, although the NVIDIA QuadroFX 5600 card reported scores up to 16x and 32x FSAA, which the FireGL V8650 card did not. The QuadroFX card shows better scaling with FSAA in Ensight and UGNX, although the FireGL shows better scaling in SolidWorks and Maya. All of the other tests scale roughly the same. Even at 8x FSAA, we see very little performance difference between the FireGL V7600 and V8650, with the exception of Maya.
Related content
TOP STORIES
Which New GPU Is For You?
KEEP INFORMED
Stay updated with the latest news and updates. Subscribe to our newsletter!
Subscribe Now