High-End Workstation Graphics Shootout - AMD FireGL V8650 Vs. NVIDIA QuadroFX 5600
by
Chris Connolly
—
Monday, January 21, 2008, 08:00 PM EDT
OpenGL Effect Benchmarks
-
Page 14: OpenGL Effect Benchmarks
-
Page 1: Introduction
-
Page 2: Specifications
-
Page 3: ATI FireGL V8650
-
Page 4: NVIDIA QuadroFX 5600
-
Page 5: Heat, Noise, and Power Consumption
-
Page 6: Testbed and Cinebench
-
Page 7: 3D Studio Max 2008 and Maya 8.5
-
Page 8: SPEC ViewPerf 10
-
Page 9: SPEC ViewPerf 10 (Continued)
-
Page 10: SPEC ViewPerf 10 (FSAA Tests)
-
Page 11: GPGPU Computing
-
Page 12: GPGPU Computing (Continued)
-
Page 13: Gaming Performance
-
Page 15: Conclusion
-
|
|
We threw in these tests for good measure, as fur and soft shadows are two notoriously processing intensive situations which designers and developers constantly have to deal with. In these tests, we see a split, as the QuadroFX 5600 card provides about 20% better performance in the Soft Shadows test, whereas the FireGL V8650 takes the Fur test, giving about 13% better performance.