High-End Workstation Graphics Shootout - AMD FireGL V8650 Vs. NVIDIA QuadroFX 5600
by
Chris Connolly
—
Monday, January 21, 2008, 08:00 PM EDT
GPGPU Computing
-
Page 11: GPGPU Computing
-
Page 1: Introduction
-
Page 2: Specifications
-
Page 3: ATI FireGL V8650
-
Page 4: NVIDIA QuadroFX 5600
-
Page 5: Heat, Noise, and Power Consumption
-
Page 6: Testbed and Cinebench
-
Page 7: 3D Studio Max 2008 and Maya 8.5
-
Page 8: SPEC ViewPerf 10
-
Page 9: SPEC ViewPerf 10 (Continued)
-
Page 10: SPEC ViewPerf 10 (FSAA Tests)
-
Page 12: GPGPU Computing (Continued)
-
Page 13: Gaming Performance
-
Page 14: OpenGL Effect Benchmarks
-
Page 15: Conclusion
-
|
General Purpose GPU computing is an important new market for workstation graphics cards to focus on. Our first set of tests show the QuadroFX 5600 delivering quicker computational performance compared to the V8650, by roughly about 13% for the most GPU intensive test.