Razer Blade 2017 Review: Solid Gaming Performance In An Ultrabook Form Factor
Razer Blade 2017: PCMark and 3DMark Performance
|
We selected three tests from the PCMark 8 benchmark suite: Home, Storage and Work. Futuremark recently improved its tests with PCMark 8 version 2. We selected the Open CL "Accelerated" options for both Home and Work.
The Razer Blade delivers near top marks in both productivity tests. The Storage score is a little lacking due to the poor write speeds seen in ATTO, but overall the Razer Blade can rise to meet your needs, no matter the task.
|
Futuremark designed 3DMark Fire Strike for desktop PCs, but today’s heavy-duty gaming laptops have the chops to take on the high-resolution texture, tessellation and other components of the test. Sky Diver, on the other hand, is aimed directly at gaming laptops and mid-range desktops.
Finally, we wrap up 3DMark with the more recently released Time Spy benchmark. Unlike Fire Strike and Sky Diver, which utilize DirectX 11, Time Spy is built on DirectX 12. This gives Time Spy access to newer API features, including asynchronous compute.
Despite the newer DirectX 12 graphics engine, our story has not really changed here. The Razer Blade continues to deliver performance dead on with expectations - great news.
Enough jostling with artificial benchmarks, let's find out how the Razer Blade fares in real world titles...