Acer Spin 5 Review: An Affordable All Aluminum 2-In-1 Laptop
Acer Spin 5: Final Thoughts and Conclusion
Despite its faults, we cannot help but like the Acer Spin 5. Its most compelling feature is its price tag. For about $800 with the Active Stylus included or $750 without, the Spin 5 as configured here rings in much cheaper than Dell's premium XPS 13 2-in-1. The Dell weighs in at $1,100 for a similar configuration, trading the Spin 5's Core i5-8265U for a low-power Core i5-8200Y, and its Active Pen is still sold separately. The Spin 5's design is not as refined and it does lack Thunderbolt 3 support, but for many consumers that may be worth $300+ in savings.
The bigger question for many consumers may be about the form-factor itself. If you do not need a convertible 2-in-1, Acer's own Swift notebooks may be a better buy. We found the Swift 3 model better at powering through intensive workloads thanks to a superior cooling configuration. The Swift 3 is a little larger at 14", though it still maintains portability. We also would not hesitate to spec out a Swift 3 with the optional NVIDIA GeForce MX150 discrete GPU for some light gaming, but we would be concerned about doing the same with the Spin 5 from a thermal standpoint.
As our benchmarks show, the Spin 5 is not a gaming oriented computer but you probably knew that. On the other hand, it is more than capable of handling mixed productivity tasks. Users tackling web browsing, email, document writing, and spreadsheets are unlikely to tax the Spin 5 to the point of thermal saturation. These users can take advantage of the Core i5-8265U's higher boost clock over the Core i5-8250U for a more responsive experience. If heavy photo editing is on the menu, the soldered 8GB of RAM may be lacking. Acer, however, also offers a Core i7-8565U equipped variation with 16GB of RAM and a 512GB NVMe SSD for about $1,200. That is still a great price for that kind of horsepower.
The mid-range market is a churning sea of compromises, but nevertheless the Acer Spin 5 is a highlight. Provided its limitations are understood, we believe it is worthy of consideration.
|
|