To get this next batch of results, we manually lowered the latencies of each memory kit to 3-3-2-4. This was the lowest possible settings we could achieve with the PQI24200 Turbo series. We set the Corsair XMS2 to the same settings as a reference.
|
Performance Comparison with SiSoft SANDRA 2004 |
Raw Bandwidth |
|
PQI24200-1GDB (3-3-2-4) |
XMS2-5300Pro (3-3-2-4) |
When we look at the effects of the lower latencies on SANDRA's results, we saw the PQI memory hit the same speeds as the Corsair at 3-3-2-4, while the Corsair modules led the results within 31MB in the Integer test and 43MB in the Floating Point test.
|
Performance Comparison with PCMark04 |
Overall Memory Score |
|
Again, we saw the PCMark04 results favor the Corsair memory with a 14 point difference, a tighter margin than the previous test.
|
In-Game Performance Comparisons With Wolf: ET |
System Memory Affects Framerates? You Bet! |
|
With Wolfenstein: ET, neither the Corsair or PQI memory scores climbed more than a fraction of a frame, although the PQI Turbo series maintained the upper hand by around 4FPS.