NVIDIA nForce 680i SLI Preview
How we configured our test systems: When configuring our test systems for the following set of benchmarks, we first entered their respective system BIOSes and set each board to its "Optimized" or "High-Performance Defaults." We then saved the settings, re-entered the BIOS and set memory timings for DDR2-800 with 4,4,4,12 1T timings. The hard drives were then formatted, and Windows XP Professional (SP2) was installed. When the Windows installation was complete, we installed the drivers necessary for our components, and removed Windows Messenger from the system. Auto-Updating and System Restore were then disabled, and we set up a 1024MB permanent page file on the same partition as the Windows installation. Lastly, we set Windows XP's Visual Effects to "best performance," installed all of our benchmarking software, defragged the hard drives, and ran all of the tests.
![]() |
|
System 1:
Asus P5W DH Deluxe Motherboard
2x1GB Corsair PC2-6400 |
System 2: AMD Athlon FX-62 (2.8GHz) Asus M2N32-SLI Deluxe (NVIDIA nForce 590 SLI)
2x1GB Corsair PC2-6400 WD740 "Raptor" HD 10,000 RPM SATA Windows XP Pro SP2 nForce 4 Drivers v6.86 NVIDIA Forceware v91.27 DirectX 9.0c |
|
![]() |
|
Preliminary Testing with SiSoft SANDRA 2007 | |
Synthetic Benchmarks |
![]() CPU Core 2 Duo X6800 @ 2.93GHz nForce 680i SLI |
![]() Multimedia Core 2 Duo X6800 @ 2.93GHz nForce 680i SLI |
![]() Memory Bandwidth Core 2 Duo X6800 @ 2.93GHz nForce 680i SLI |
SANDRA's relatively light-duty CPU Arithmetic, Multimedia, and Memory Bandwidth benchmarks didn't reveal anything out of the ordinary. The EVGA nForce 680i SLI motherboard performed right on par with, or slightly better than the 975X Express reference system in SADNRA's database in the CPU and Multimedia tests. The Memory Bandwidth benchmark, however, showed the 975X Express with a slight edge, but advantages in a synthetic test like this one don't always translate into any real-world performance gains.