HP Spectre X360 Ultrabook Review: Sleek, Sexy, Convertible
by
Marco Chiappetta
—
Sunday, March 01, 2015, 02:00 PM EDT
LAME MT and Cinebench
-
Page 6: LAME MT and Cinebench
-
Page 1: Introduction and Specifications
-
Page 2: Design and Hardware Features
-
Page 3: Display, Build Quality, User Experience
-
Page 4: Software and Setup
-
Page 5: Benchmarks: SANDRA and Sunspider
-
Page 7: PCMark 8 v2 Benchmarks
-
Page 8: 3DMark and FarCry 2
-
Page 9: Battery Life
-
Page 10: Our Summary and Conclusion
-
|
For this test, we created our own 223MB WAV file (a mile-long Grateful Dead jam) and converted it to the MP3 format using the multi-thread capable LAME MT application, in both single and multi-thread modes. Processing times are recorded below, listed in seconds. Shorter times equate to better performance.
The Surface Pro 3's higher CPU clocks give it a slight edge here over the HP Spectre X360 in this audio encoding test. In comparison to the XPS 13 though, HP's latest offering does very well in the single-threaded test and finishes only a second behind in the multi-threaded test.
|
The HP Spectre X360's CPU performance was right in-line with the XPS 13 in the Cinebench multi-threaded CPU benchmark. The Spectre X360's OpenGL performance was slightly better, however, most likely due to newer drivers and the clean software installation on the machine.