|
The RADEON 9100 IGP |
Plus, the
Reference Board |
|
Architecturally, the RADEON 9100 IGP is very similar
to ATI's desktop RADEON 9200 family, in that both
processors are DirectX 8.1-compliant. But integrated graphics cores are necessarily slimmed down
to accommodate particular packaging and thermal
guidelines. In short, the 9100 sports two pixel
pipelines compared to the 9200's four.
Furthermore, the hardware T&L pipeline has been pulled
from the chip. Instead of hardware transform and
lighting, the 9100 offloads vertex calculations to the
CPU itself, purportedly sacrificing very little
performance. But even armed with the "light"
version of the 9200 core, ATI doesn't exactly have a
formidable opponent in the integrated Pentium 4
market. Ironically, Intel's Extreme
Graphics 2 is the only real competition.
Manufactured on a .15-micron TSMC
process, our early sample of the 9100 IGP is operating
at 300MHz. Third-party motherboard manufacturers
will have free reign to set their own operating
frequencies, though, depending on the complexity of
cooling that they want to implement. ATI's Chris
Hook claims the core will run reliably right up to
350MHz, should an active cooler be used.
In its
current incarnation, ATI's RADEON 9100 IGP officially
supports Pentium 4 processors that operate on 400 and
533MHz front side buses. Additionally, ATI and
Intel made a joint announcement that confirms the
RADEON 9100 IGP will also function properly with
800MHz front side bus processors - valuable because
ATI anticipates most system builders will couple 9100
boards with 800MHz FSB processors.
Early on in
our 875P testing, it became apparent that
certain "Canterwood" boards wouldn't work properly
with some brands of DDR400 memory that apparently
hadn't been validated by Intel's own labs. This
was naturally a concern when we started testing 865PE
boards, and of course, when we outfitted the sample
RADEON 9100 system with two sticks of DDR400 memory.
Fortunately, compatibility wasn't an issue, even with
ATI's pre-production board. We went a step
further to test different memory frequencies, gauging
which speeds delivered the best performance (an
especially important point, considering that the
nForce2 chipset favors synchronous operation).
Indeed, the RADEON 9100 IGP ran best in dual-channel DDR400
mode, regardless of the front
side bus speed. No doubt, this is due to the
increased memory bandwidth available to the integrated
graphics core.
One
particularly unique feature of the RADEON 9100 IGP is
its ability to drive a third display, even with a
discrete card installed. Most integrated
solutions allow you to choose between a discrete card
and the internal processor. ATI's SurroundView,
on the other hand, enables up to two monitors,
connected to an AGP card,
to work in conjunction with the RADEON 9100 core in
either 2D or 3D modes, akin to Matrox's Surround
Gaming.
Mobility
RADEON 9100 IGP:
The mobile
variant of the RADEON 9100 IGP is nearly identical to
the desktop chipset. It does include a dual LVDS
interface for resolutions up to QXGA (2048x1536) and
ATI's POWERPLAY support to adjust the graphics engine
clock, memory clock, and core voltage, obviously with
the intention of preserving battery life. It
also supports Intel's SpeedStep technology.
|
The Hot Hardware Test Systems |
RADEON 9100 IGP
versus 865G |
|
Intel Pentium 4 3.06GHz (533MHz) with Hyper
Threading enabled
ATI RADEON 9100 IGP Pre-Production (RS300)
Intel D865GBF (Intel 865G)
512MB Corsair
XMS3200C2
Seagate 120GB
Serial ATA 7200RPM
Maxtor
Diamondmax Plus 8 20GB ATA-100
Reference
Silicon Image Serial ATA controller card
Windows XP
Professional with SP1
DirectX 9.0a
|
One of the primary
differences between Intel's Extreme Graphics 2
setup and that of ATI's RADEON 9100 IGP is the
amount of memory that can be dedicated to the
graphics core. While both systems
featured 512MB of DDR400 memory, the D865GBF
was limited to a 16MB frame buffer, while the
RADEON 9100 could be configured up to 128MB.
This affected the dedicated graphics and
system memory of each platform.
Each
platform featured Windows XP with Service Pack
1. In configuring the operating system,
we disabled System Restore and the Automatic
Updating feature. Finally, we set all of
the graphical enhancements to "Performance" in
the Windows XP properties. It should
also be noted that we disabled audio and
Ethernet in order to minimize the effects of
these subsystems on overall performance.
|
|