|
ZDBench Winstones |
Playing with the stones |
|
Content
Creation Winstone 2002:
When it comes to
multimedia application benchmarking, we think Content
Creation Winstone 2002 is well suited for the job.
This program uses a series of popular multimedia based
application to assess a system's abilities and issues a
score.
Below is a list
of applications that Content Creation Winstone uses to come
up with its rating.
-
Adobe
Photoshop 6.0.1
-
Adobe
Premiere 6.0
-
Macromedia
Director 8.5
-
Macromedia
Dreamweaver UltraDev 4
-
Microsoft
Windows Media Encoder 7.01.00.3055
-
Netscape
Navigator 6/6.01
-
Sonic
Foundry Sound Forge 5.0c (build 184)
|
These two tests
were the most perplexing for us. In fact, we ran and
then re-ran these tests a few times, to check that the
numbers were indeed correct, and they were. For
whatever reason, the VIA P4PB dropped the ball in the
Winstones, placing dead last in the DDR333 tests and even
lower when using DDR400. Overclocking the system
raised the score appreciably, increasing it by over 2
points. Since these tests are somewhat hard disk
sensitive, as well as memory intensive, this shortcoming
would point to VIA's Southbridge performance, memory
latency/bandwidth, or both.
Business Winstone 2002:
Business
Winstone is a benchmark that measures a PC's overall
performance when running applications that are commonly
found in the everyday workstation environment.
Some of the
programs it runs to determine a Business Winstone 2002
rating are:
-
Lotus
Notes® R5
-
Microsoft® FrontPage® 2002 SP-1
-
Microsoft® PowerPoint® 2002 SP-1
-
Microsoft® Excel 2002 SP-1
-
Microsoft® Access 2002 SP-1
-
Microsoft® Word 2002 SP-1
-
Microsoft® Project 2000
-
WinZip®
8.0
-
Norton
AntiVirusTM from Symantec
-
Netscape® 6.2.1
|
The trend
continued with Business Winstone 2002. The VIA P4PB
just didn't keep up with the Intel based boards, regardless
of the speed of the memory used. What was especially
troublesome, was that even after we raised the FSB to
150MHz, the score we got from the VIA board did not even
beat the Gigabyte board, and only slipped by the MSI board
by 0.1. It really just seems that the memory timings
are not as tight as they could have been for VIA's new P4
chispet.
Our final
impressions about the VIA P4PB Ultra were that its bark
seemed to be worse than the bite. That's not to say
that the board didn't necessarily perform well, on the
contrary it typically placed smack dab in the middle of the
two comparison Intel boards. The only exception was
during the testing with the Winstones where it really fell
off of the pace. It's just that we weren't overly
excited by the performance either, especially so when using
DDR400. With the memory set at 400MHz DDR, there
should be an increase in bandwidth (as was shown in our
Sandra testing), but this resulted in worse performance due
to the inherent latencies. Overclocking was also
limited, possibly by the lack of CPU Vcore settings, and we
reached only half the speed increase of what we were able to
with i845PE boards using the same exact components. We
were buoyed by the impressive bundle, which catered to
enthusiasts and modders alike, but these additions came with
a larger price tag, currently listing at $135, on various
price search engines. With increased competition from
Intel and SIS, this board just didn't shine as much as it
could have, although our feelings are that VIA is definitely
on the right track. We give the VIA P4PB Ultra a 7.5
on the HotHardware Heat Meter.
Have you checked out the HotHardware Forum lately?
You mean you haven't? Click here
to get in on the action!
|