TEAMGROUP T-Force Cardea Zero Z440 PCIe Gen 4.0 SSD Review
T-Force Cardea Zero Z440: PCIe 4.0 Enables Glorious Bandwidth
As we hinted above, this drive rides the latest PCI Express bus for the most potential bandwidth possible with four lanes of PCIe 4.0 connectivity. While Samsung holds down the high end with its SSD 980 Pro and TEAMGROUP itself has a more expensive A440 model drive, the Cardea Zero Z440 aims for a more affordable price points. Still, this drive doesn't skimp on the specs with upwards of 5 GB per second of reads and 4.5 GB/s in sequential writes. And with that, now is a great time to run down all the Cardea Zero Z440's specs.
|Form Factor||M.2 2280 NVMe|
|Interface||PCI Express 4.0 x4|
|Capacities||1 TB, 2 TB|
|NAND||96-layer BiCS TLC|
|Sequential Read/Write||5,000 MB/s read, 4,400 MB/s write|
|Random 4K Read/Write||750K IOPs Read, 750K IOPs Write|
|Total Bytes Written (TBW)||1,800 TB|
|Storage Temperature||From -40 C to 85 C|
|Operating Temperature||From 0 C to 70 C|
|Dimensions||3.15 x 0.87 x 0.09 inches (80 x 22 x 3.5 mm)|
|Weight||0.317 ounces (9 grams)|
|Shock Resistance||1,500 G @ 0.5 msec half sine|
|MTBF||1.7 Million Hours|
|Warranty/Support||5-year limited warranty|
|Pricing||Currently $199 For 1TB At Amazon|
The Phison PS5016-E16 controller at the heart of the Cardea Zero Z440 has been around for a while, making it a mature but still pretty speedy platform upon which to build a budget-friendly PCIe 4.0 drive. In fact, if we look back at both our Ryzen 9 3900X review, which featured a Gigabyte AORUS PCIe 4.0 drive, and Sabrent Rocket 4.0 review, we can see that this drive configuration has been through our doors a time or two. That's not a bad thing, either, because those drives are pretty fast and the Phison E16 controller supports AES-256 encryption. While Phison's PS5018-E18 is right around the corner with 7 GB of throughput, drives based on that controller won't be as affordable as this one.
T-Force Cardea Zero Z440 SpecificationsThe Cardea Zero Z440 has a copper and graphene label over the controller and 96-layer 3D BiCS NAND, which should help spread heat and keep the drive from throttling under normal conditions. This isn't anything new, exactly; many SSDs, including the Sabrent mentioned above, have a similar setup, and it works well. The drive comes in a standard M.2 2280 form factor, which is compatible with the vast majority of notebooks and desktop motherboards alike, especially those with PCIe 4.0 connectivity like those with Intels' Z590 and AMD's 500 series chipsets.
The specs table carries a couple of very welcome sights. First of all, the total bytes written (TBW) rating comes up to 1,800 TB for the 1 TB drive's TLC NAND. Cheaper drives like the WD Blue SN550 we recently reviewed carry much lower ratings because those drives use QLC memory, which stores four bits per channel. Corners have to be cut somewhere, but this isn't a bottom of the barrel drive, so a longer endurance rating is expected. TEAMGROUP stands by that, too, with a five-year limited warranty.
We're reviewing the 1 TB version of the Cardea Zero Z440, but there's also a 2 TB version available. The TBW endurance rating is 3,600 TB for the 2 TB drive, but that's expected with twice as much capacity on board. According to the larger drive's specifications, the two capacities will perform about the same. Both are rated for 5 GB per second of writes and 4.4 GB per second in sequential reads. The Cardea Zero Z440 should be no slouch in the random read and write department either, as it's rated for 750k IOPS in both directions.
T-Force Cardea Zero Z440 BenchmarksIt's time to dive into performance testing on the T-Force Cardea Zero Z440. Under each test condition, the SSDs tested here were installed as secondary volumes in our testbed, with a separate drive used for the OS and benchmark installations. Our testbed's motherboard was updated with the latest BIOS available at the time of publication. We secure erased each SSD prior to testing (when applicable), and left them blank without partitions for some tests. Other benchmarks required the drives to be partitioned and formatted, as is the case with the ATTO, PCMark, and CrystalDiskMark tests. Windows firewall, automatic updates, and screen savers were all disabled before testing and Windows 10 Quiet Hours / Focus Assist was enabled.
Video Card -
|AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
ASUS TUF Gaming X570-Plus Wi-Fi
GeForce RTX 3070
32GB Corsair DDR4-3200
Integrated on board
Sandisk SSD Ultra 500 GB (SATA Boot drive)
T-Force Cardea Zero Z440 (1 TB)
Addlink S70 (1 TB)
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 (1 TB)
WD Blue SN550 (1 TB)
Chipset Drivers -
|Windows 10 Pro x64 (20H2)
HD Tune v5.75
CrystalDiskMark v7 x64
PCMark 10 Quick Storage Bench
Our first test was quite a surprised. We had expected similar performance to the Sabrent Rocket 4.0 which has the same Phison E16 controller and 1 TB of BiCS TLC NAND. However, it seems that TEAMGROUP was able to extract a little extra performance, at least in this test, especially on the write portion. We're definitely off to a solid start here.
ATTO is a "quick and dirty" type of disk benchmark that measures transfer speeds across a specific volume length which, like SANDRA, uses a formatted partition. It measures raw transfer rates for both reads and writes and graphs them out in an easily interpreted chart. We chose .5KB through 64MB transfer sizes and a queue depth of 6 over a total max volume length of 256MB. ATTO's workloads are sequential in nature and measure raw bandwidth, rather than I/O response time, access latency, etc.
In terms of raw throughput, the T-Force Cardea Zero Z440 is right on par with the Sabrent Rocket 4.0, and the drive more or less hit its performance targets. More than 5 GB per second on reads once we hit the 256 kB block size is blistering quick. Writing at 4 GB per second from 128 kB and beyond is also pretty darn quick. Unfortunately, our testbed used here isn't the same as the one used in the Samsung 980 Pro review, so that drive has been excluded. The Samsung also a more expensive option, even at 1 TB capacities, so it's in a different class altogether.
While the Sabrent Rocket 4.0 failed to distinguish itself from our PCI Express 3.0 NVMe drives in the IO tests, the Cardea Zero Z440 placed itself above and beyond, especially at low block sizes where each transaction counts. As the block size increases, each IO operation grows in size, so all of our drives start to become limited by more sequential performance and less random throughput. Tailing off at the end is expected, regardless of the price or performance class.
Next up we ran the Compression Benchmark built-into AS SSD, an SSD specific benchmark being developed by Alex Intelligent Software. This test uses a progressively more compressible data set to blast data at the drive and read it back. If the drive can optimize its write speed using data compression, the result will be that more compressible loads write more quickly to the drive. We only graphed a small fraction of the data, at 1% compressible, 50% compressible, and 100% compressible data, but the details bear out that this trend is representative of the benchmark’s complete results.
As a throughput test, the Cardea Zero Z440 once again matches the Sabrent Rocket 4.0, so we're starting to get a feel for how this drive performs: very fast. Both drives see moderate gains on the read test as the compressibility of the data is increased. On the other hand, performance in the write test remains flat.
Next up, we'll see a few more tests, and then render our verdict in the conclusion of this review.