|
Benchmarks
and Comparisons Continued... |
DirectX, OpenGL
and The Winstones... |
|
OpenGL with
Quake 3:
To give you a
good idea of what to expect with OpenGL gaming and the MSI
KT3 Ultra ARU, we ran the Quake 3 Demo 001 at three popular
resolutions. In this benchmark we turn the video
settings to High-Quality and set the colors to 32-Bit.
As in earlier tests, the scores were compared to the ASUS
A7N266-E.
At the lower
resolutions, the ASUS board had a marginal lead over the
KT3, although as the resolution increased, the tides turned
in favor of the MSI KT3 Ultra-ARU. Either way you look
at it, triple digits at 1600x1200x32 speaks for itself.
Direct X with MadOnion's 3DMark2001:
Now it's
DirectX's turn to strut its stuff with 3DMark2001. We
ran this test on each board with the same GeForce3 Ti500
installed at 800x600 and 1024x768 with 32-Bit color depth.
This time around
the MSI KT3 maintained a solid edge over the ASUS A7N266-E
motherboard at both resolutions. With a little bit of
overclocking of both the motherboard and video card, a score
in excess of 10,000 points is well within reach.
Business Winstone 2001:
Now that the
gaming oriented tests are complete, we'll take a look at the
systems overall ability to process business related
applications using Business Winstone 2001. Below is
the description from the
etestinglabs website of how Business Winstone 2001 tests
a systems performance.
"Business
Winstone is a system-level, application-based benchmark that
measures a PC's overall performance when running today's
top-selling Windows-based 32-bit applications on Windows 98
SE, Windows NT 4.0 (SP6 or later), Windows 2000, Windows Me,
or Windows XP. Business Winstone doesn't mimic what these
packages do; it runs real applications through a series of
scripted activities and uses the time a PC takes to complete
those activities to produce its performance scores. The
CD-ROM that contains Business Winstone includes all the
files and application portions you need to run the
benchmark."
With Business
Winstone 2002, the MSI KT3 Ultra ARU lagged behind the Asus
A7N2366-E system when run on a single-drive. Although,
once we set up the RAID-0, the score improved tremendously,
with a gain of over 21%, clearly showing the potential gains
of a RAID-0 array. This test demonstrates that there
is little in the business application world that this board
can't handle efficiently. But then there is Content
Creation 2002.
Content
Creation Winstone 2002:
Content Creation
2002 focuses on systems ability to run multimedia intensive
applications. Below is the description from the
etestinglabs website of how Content
CreationWinstone 2002 tests a systems performance.
"Content
Creation Winstone is a system-level, application-based
benchmark that measures a PC's overall performance when
running top, Windows-based, 32-bit, content creation
applications on Windows 98, Windows 2000, Windows Me, or
Windows XP. Content Creation Winstone 2002 uses the
following applications:
-
Adobe
Photoshop 6.0.1
-
Adobe
Premiere 6.0
-
Macromedia
Director 8.5
-
Macromedia
Dreamweaver UltraDev 4
-
Microsoft
Windows Media Encoder 7.01.00.3055
-
Netscape
Navigator 6/6.01
-
Sonic
Foundry Sound Forge 5.0c (build 184)
Following the
lead of real users, Content Creation Winstone 2002 keeps
multiple applications open at once and switches among those
applications. Content Creation Winstone 2002 is a single
large test that runs the above applications through a series
of scripted activities and returns a single score. Those
activities focus on what we call "hot spots," periods of
activity that make your PC really work--the times where
you're likely to see an hourglass or a progress bar."
This time
around, the KT3 Ultra ARU lead the way over the ASUS board,
posting an impressive 31.8 points with a single-drive and
35.4 with RAID-0. When it comes to multimedia rich
content, the KT3 Ulta ARU is up to the task, RAID or no
RAID.
Throughout
testing of the MSI KT3 Ultra ARU we were continually
impressed with its performance and quality. With an
excellent selection of the most current features available,
such as USB 2, ATA133 and DDR SDRAM bandwidth up to 333MHz.,
the KT3 offers a lot of horsepower. No matter what you
may have in store for the KT3 Ultra ARU, it has the capacity
to get the job done in good fashion. As more systems incorporate the new
KT333 chipset, we have a feeling that, in time, the KT3
Ultra ARU should prove itself to be a leader in the
performance motherboard market.
Along with its
great performance and stability, the board is simply
gorgeous to look at too. If you are a serious gamer/overclocker
thinking of building a dream machine, the MSI KT3 Ultra ARU
would be a great choice if you were planning on using a case
with a plexi-glass window. When it came to
overclocking this system, we had a good overall experience,
boosting the system performance by 11%. We
found the D-LED feature to be a very useful tool and believe
it may prove to be helpful to the serious overclocking
enthusiast. If you are in the market for a new
high-performance Athlon based system, the MSI KT3 Ultra ARU
could be the board for you.
In conclusion,
this reviewer was very impressed with the KT3 Ultra ARU and
found it to be a terrific motherboard. For excellent
overall quality, performance and craftsmanship, we give the
MSI KT3 Ultra ARU an enthusiastic Hot Hardware Heat Meter
Rating of a 9 as well as Editor's Choice for its overall
excellence.
HotHardware's PC Hardware Forum is all the rage! Are
you in?
|