Asus W90Vp 18.4" Gaming Notebook
Test Setup & 3DMark06 Results
To give you better feel for how the W90Vp’s performance measures up, we’ll compare it to Dell’s XPS M1730 and Asus’ C90S. We’ll also compare this 18.4" beast to two desktop systems to give you an idea for how much power you can expect while on the go. Here’s a closer look at each of our comparison systems:
 |
|
|
Dell XPS M1730 |
ASUS C90S Intel Intel 945G Chipset 2x1GB DDR2-667 512MB NVIDIA GeForce 8600M GT On-Board Ethernet 160GB Hard Drive Windows Vista Ultimate 15.4" WXGA Display |
Desktop Comparison 1 |
Desktop Comparison 2 AMD Athlon X2 6400+ (3.2GHz) Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6 2x1GB Corsair PC2-8500 GeForce 8800 GTX WD740 "Raptor" HD Windows Vista Ultimate |
|
|
|
To begin our benchmark testing, we’ll measure CPU performance using Futuremark 3DMark06's CPU performance module. 3DMark06's test is useful for comparing performance between similarly equipped systems. This multi-threaded, "gaming related" DirectX metric consists of different 3D scenes that are generated with software and hardware GPU renderers, which is also dependant on the host CPU's performance. In these tests, calculations that are normally reserved for a 3D accelerator are sent to the central processor. 3DMark06's GPU rendering tests utilize a mix of SM2.0, SM3.0, and HDR techniques and effects.
Needless to say, the W90Vp obliterated comparable machines, many of which are rather potent in their own rights. Of note, the W90Vp just barely bested the recently released Toshiba Qosmio X305-Q725, but considering that said machine also houses the very same CPU as the W90Vp (Intel's Core 2 Quad Q9000 at 2.0GHz), we're not shocked by the tiny gap (2978 on the W90Vp; 2946 on the Toshiba).
;)
Click To Enlarge
