ASUS Extreme AX600XT vs. MSI PCX 5750: Budget PCI-Express
HotHardware Test Bed & Image Quality
HOW WE CONFIGURED THE TEST SYSTEM: We tested both cards on a Shuttle SB81 i915 chipsest-based motherboard, powered by an Intel
|
Hardware: Motherboard - Video Cards - Memory - Audio - Hard Drive - Optical Drive - Other - Software: Operating System - Chipset Drivers - DirectX - Video Drivers - |
Intel Shuttle SB81 Motherboard i915G Chipset GeForce 6600 GT ATI Radeon X600 XT GeForce PCX 5750 1024MB Kingston HyperX PC3500 CAS 2 Integrated SoundMax Audio Western Digital "Raptor" 36GB - 10,000RPM - SATA Lite-On 16X DVD-ROM 3.5-inch floppy drive Windows XP Professional SP2 (Fully Patched) Intel INF v6.0.1.1002 DirectX 9.0c ATI Catalyst v4.9 NVIDIA Forceware v65.76 |
|
Before we get into the benchmarking of these two cards, we decided a few screen shots were in order. Typically, we like to run off a few screen shots to show the image quality potential of a particular video card. Naturally, we need to take into account the class of card we are reviewing before passing judgement on how good or bad an image looks. Let's face it, you get what you pay for.
Below we snapped the same sequence of images with each card with various objects in hand. The images were taken with High-Quality set in game, 4XAA and 8X Anisotropic Filtering enabled in drivers, both consistent with the settings used to benchmark Doom 3 later on.
Screen Shots Of Doom 3 taken with MSI's GeForce PCX 5750
Screen Shots Of Doom 3 taken with the ASUS Extreme AX600XT
As you can see, both cards were capable of rendering a decent image, but whether the game was playable remains to be seen later in the benchmarking segment. Overall, each card offered very similar quality. We'd have to say the screen captures taken using the ASUS card appear slightly brighter by default, but it's nothing a simple tweak to the brightness slider couldn't balace out.