ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro SSD Review: Strong Performance, Aggressive Price

ADATA SX8200 Pro NVMe SSD: SANDRA And ATTO Benchmarks

Next we ran SiSoft SANDRA 2017, the the System ANalyzer, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant. Here, we used the Physical Disk test suite and provide the results from our comparison SSDs. The benchmarks were run on clean drives that lacked any partions. Read and write performance metrics are detailed below.

Synthetic Disk Benchmarking

We saw a similar performance trend in the SiSoft SANDRA Physical Disk test. Here, the ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro outpaces the original and Intel and Crucial drives, but trails the Samsung SSD 970 EVO and newer EVO Plus.
ATTO Disk Benchmark
More Information Here:

ATTO is another "quick and dirty" type of disk benchmark that measures transfer speeds across a specific volume length. It measures raw transfer rates for both reads and writes and graphs them out in an easily interpreted chart. We chose .5KB through 64MB transfer sizes and a queue depth of 6 over a total max volume length of 256MB. ATTO's workloads are sequential in nature and measure raw bandwidth, rather than I/O response time, access latency, etc.



ATTO tells a similar story. Here, the ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro puts up reads and writes that are superior the the original SX8200, and it's faster than the Intel and Crucial drives, too, but Samsung still rules the roost.

Related content