|
Elsa's
Erazor X - GeForce & Revelator 3D Shutter Glasses
Breaking
out from the "me too" crowd.
|
|
|
| |
|
Our
Test System
Full Tower ATX
Case w/ 300W PS, Pentium3 -533B Overclocked to 600 MHz.(Provided By OutsideLoop
Computers),
Soyo SY-6BA+IV DMA66 capable motherboard, 128MB of PC133 HSDRAM, WD
18G 7200RPM DMA66 Hard Drive, Elsa
Erazor X AGP with 32MB , Kenwood
72X CDROM, Win 98SE, DirectX 7, Elsa
Release Drivers version 4.12.01.0104-0020 based on NVidia 3.53
reference drivers
|
|
Benchmarks
|
| |
|
|
|
Quake
3 Arena Timedemo
First we ran the
tests overclocked at 150MHz. core and 180MHz. memory clocks. We ran
both the Quake3 Arena demo version 1.08 and the full release version
of Quake 3 Arena. The reason we did this was to give you a basis for
comparison with respect to the Leadtek
GeForce card we
reviewed recently.
We also ran
tests at the the default core and memory clock frequencies for the
full release version of Quake 3.
Quake
3 Arena Demo version 1.08 - Timdemo
Quake
3 Arena Full Release Timedemo
|
| |
| What
is very interesting here is the fact that the full release version
of Quake 3 Arena is about 10% slower in terms of frame rate on the
GeForce. This will probably track the same way for other cards as
well. Never the less, it is apparent on the Q3A Demo tests that the
higher core and memory overclock capability of the Erazor X yields
top performance. |
| |
|
|
|
And now for a
quick D3D test...
Forsaken
Ship Demo @ 150MHz. Core and 180MHz. Memory
Once again the
math is simple. Higher clock speeds = higher frame rate for the
Erazor X.
|
| |
| |
|
|
| We
didn't want to bore you with another D3D test in 16 bit color. We
decided to have a little more fun. |
| |
|
|
|
Erazor
X - GeForce 3D Mark 2000
T&L
Benchmarks ! --->
|
.jpg)
.jpg)
