|
Setup & Quality |
Kinda Tight |
|
Front Mounted
Connectors:
- Game Port
- IR Send /
Receive
- Headphones
- Microphone
- Speakers
- Volume Control
- PS2 Mouse Port
- USB x 2
|
Rear Mounted
Connectors:
- PS2 Keyboard &
Mouse
- 9-Pin Serial x
2
- 15-Pin VGA
- S-Video
- Composite
Video
- 10/100
Ethernet
- USB x 2
- Microphone
- Headphones
- Speakers
|
Setting up the Thunderbolt
was just like any other system...only smaller!
The case is designed very well, which makes the
relative lack of space a non-issue though. The
3.5" drive tray, that house the hard drive and floppy
drive, is easily removable, opening up the middle of
the system. A CD-ROM drive simply slides into
the 5.25" bay at the top. The CPU and DIMMs are
installed just like any other system, then it's only a
matter of connection the data and power cables to your
drives.
With the system completely
"built", there is still a good amount of space
available inside the case (relatively speaking).
It's obvious a lot of thought was put into the design
and layout of the Thunderbolt. There were some
things that could have been improved upon though.
The DIMM slots, cross the AGP slot's path, so
installing extra long video cards may be a problem, a
GeForce 4 Ti 4200 fit in the system just fine FYI.
There is also a 40-wire cable, that we were forced to
route under the front of our video card which made us
a little uncomfortable. The biggest problem we
had with the Thunderbolt was its lack of support for
533MHz FSB Pentium 4s. There is a jumper on the
motherboard that is supposed to enable 533MHz FSB
support, but with the revision we were using it caused
the system not to boot when enabled.
TESTING
METHODOLOGY:
Due to the
significant variation in benchmark scores we have seen
from one site to the next, we feel it is necessary to
explain exactly how we configure our test systems
before running any benchmarks. When testing the
Thunderbolt, we first entered the system BIOS and set
the board to "Load Optimized Defaults". We then
configured the Memory manually to run at 133MHz, with
the CAS Latency and other memory timings set to
2-2-5-2, with 4-Way Bank Interleaving and a 1T command
rate. The hard drive was then formatted, and Windows
XP Professional was installed. After the Windows
installation had completed, we installed the VIA
4-In-1 drivers and then hit the Windows Update website
and downloaded all of the available updates, with the
exception of the ones related to Windows Messenger.
Then we installed the rest of the necessary drivers,
and disabled then removed Windows Messenger from the
system. Auto-Updating and System Restore were also
disabled, and we setup a 768MB permanent paging file.
Lastly, we set Windows XP's Visual Effects to "best
performance", installed all of the benchmarking
software, defragged the hard drive and ran all of the
tests at the CPU's default and overclocked speeds.
|
The Hot Hardware Test Systems |
Packin' Some
Heat! |
|
HARDWARE:
Mini
Barebones System (P4) CF-S868
Intel Pentium 4 "Northwood" 2.2GHz (2200MHz)
256MB Corsair XMS PC2400 DDR RAM
Maxtor 20GB UDMA/100 7200 RPM Hard Drive
NEC 16X ATAPI DVD-ROM Drive
Standard 3.5" Floppy
On-Board NIC
On-Board Sound
SOFTWARE:
Microsoft Windows XP Professional (With all current
Critical Updates)
VIA 4-In-1 4.42
NVIDIA Detonator XP v29.42
All other drivers
installed from included CD.
|
Performance With SiSoft Sandra 2002 |
That's Our
Girl... |
|
SiSoftware's SANDRA (the System ANalyzer,
Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant)
is a very popular benchmarking, information and
diagnostic utility. We began our testing with
four of the built-in sub-system tests that are part of
the SANDRA 2002 benchmarking suite, CPU,
Multimedia, Memory and File System, running at the
CPU's default clock speed of 2200MHz (22x100MHz) and an overclocked speed of 2380MHz (22x108MHz).
CPU @
2.20GHz
CPU @ 2.38GHz
Multimedia
@ 2.20GHz
Multimedia @ 2.38GHz
HARD DRIVE
MEM @
2.20GHz
MEM @ 2.38GHz
Integrated Video
Integrated Video
MEM @
2.20GHz.
MEM @ 2.38GHz.
GF4 Ti4200
GF4 Ti4200
For the most part, the Thunderbolt's performance was good. We did see
some unusual things in the SiSoft SANDRA CPU test
though. At the processor's default clock speed,
the system performed as it should. When we
overclocked the system, however, FPU performance soared
while ALU performance fell. We repeated the test
multiple times and got the same results. What was
even more unusual, was that none of the other tests
showed any ill effects when overclocking. We
haven't singled out the cause of this anomaly yet, but
I tend to believe that it's some sort of
incompatibility with SANDRA because the
Multimedia and Memory Bandwidth scores scaled properly
with the increased clock speed. You'll
notice we've also included a second set of Memory
Bandwidth benchmarks. The top pair were taken
using the integrated video, the bottom pair were taken
with a GeForce 4 Ti4200 installed. Not only does
the integrated video eat up some available memory, but
it uses a good amount of bandwidth transferring data
in and out of system memory. Simply installing a
video card increased available memory bandwidth by
about 10%.
|
More Performance With PC Mark 2002 |
CPU, MEM and
HD... |
|
Next up we
have MadOnion's relatively new PCMark 2002
benchmarking suite. We ran PC Mark 2002's CPU,
Memory and Hard Drive performance modules, which
incorporate the following tests:
CPU
Test:
Memory
Test Technical details: (Quoted)
Raw
read, write, and read-modify-write operations are
performed starting from a 3072 kilobytes array
decreasing in size to 1536 KB, 384 KB, 48 KB and
finally 6 KB. Each size of block is tested two second
and the amount of accessed data is given as result. In
the STL container test a list of 116 byte elements is
constructed and sorted by an integer pseudo-random
key. The list is then iterated through as many times
as possible for 2 seconds and the total size of the
accessed elements is given as result. There are 6 runs
of this test, with 24576 items in the largest run
corresponding to a total data amount of 1536 KB,
decreasing in size to 12288 items (768 KB), 6144 items
(384 KB), 1536 items (96 KB), 768 items (48 KB) and 96
items in the smallest run corresponding to 6 KB of
total data.
The Thunderbolt's
performance in MadOnion's PCMark2002 was on par with
similarly configured systems based on other DDR
chipsets for the Pentium 4. The CPU score of 5308 was right where
we expected it to be, but the Memory score fell
slightly behind an i845E we recently reviewed.
Hard drive performance was good, considering the
Maxtor drive we were using wasn't exactly a speed
demon!
Some More Benchmarking and Final Thoughts
|