ASRock Challenger Arc B570 GPU Review: Battlemage For Even Less
Before we get into the benchmarks, let's do a quick refresher on Intel's new driver control panel. Intel's Arc Control application was retired with the launch of the Arc B580, and the new hotness is simply called "Intel Graphics Software." That branding is a little bland but, well, they can't all be winners.
Besides the utilitarian name, the practical mentality extends into the application itself. It's plain to the point of being Spartan. It's no-nonsense and all-function, exactly the way I like my software (and especially drivers). The home screen lets you configure options for how you are notified of driver updates, and also shows a quick summary of your hardware.
If you click on Profiles on the left, you can have the application manually search for your games so that you can customize profiles for each one. There aren't enough settings in the app to really justify this sort of thing, yet, but it's nice to see Intel laying the groundwork for when it eventually adds more toggles to fiddle with.
Under the Graphics menu you can tweak a few settings regarding how the GPU operates. This is where you can force v-sync off globally, if you're the type who does that, and also where you will toggle the Low Latency mode which now includes an "On+Boost" option. Seems familiar, somehow.
Unsurprisingly, on the Display page you can adjust your display settings. There's a nice assortment of basic display settings here including the kinds of things that took AMD and NVIDIA decades to add.
The Performance page lets you view various performance metrics in real time. This page would be more useful as an overlay, to tell the truth. Arc Control had the ability to operate as an overlay (actually, it was initially only available in that form), but the new application doesn't, at least not yet.
The Tuning page is really the more exciting part of this tab. On this page you can dial in some overclocking settings, if you so desire. Intel pops up a warning when you start twiddling in here, which is a good thing. We'd like to explore overclocking on the Arc B570 at another time, but we just didn't have the bandwidth for that in this review. We will revisit this for sure though.
Overall, the new Intel Graphics Software application offers a clean interface focused on the essentials, and it's both easier to navigate and easier on the eyes than the Arc Control application it replaces. However, we would like to see the overlay capability come back, as well as functions for screenshots and video recording. You can get there with third-party tools, but it's so convenient when it's built into the driver interface.
HotHardware's Test System:
| Processor: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K "Arrow Lake" 24-core CPU Motherboard: MSI MEG Z890 ACE ATX Motherboard Video Cards: ASRock Challenger Arc B570 10G Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition 12G ASRock Challenger Arc A580 8G Intel Arc A750 LImited Edition 8G Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 16GB Gigabyte Windforce 3X Radeon RX 7600 Gaming OC 8G MSI MECH 2X Radeon RX 6750 XT 12G XFX QICK 319 Radeon RX 7700 XT 12G EVGA XC Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 12G MSI VENTUS 2X BLACK GeForce RTX 4060 8G OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti Founders Edition 8G Graphics Drivers: Intel Arc Driver 101.6449 (Alchemist) Intel Arc Driver 101.6449 (Battlemage) AMD Adrenalin Software 24.12.1 NVIDIA GeForce driver 566.36 Memory: 2× 24GB Kingston Fury DDR5-8400 CUDIMM Storage: Boot: Intel Optane 905P 480GB U.2 SSD Games: Solidigm P5430 15.3 TB SSD |
OS: Windows 11 Pro x64 24H2 v26100 Benchmarks: Blnder 4.3.0 Geekbench 6.3.0 Geekbench AI 1.2 MLPerf Client 0.5.0 Baldur's Gate 3 Final Fantasy XIV Dawntrail 1.1 Indiana Jones and the Great Circle Doom Eternal Palworld Selaco Warframe 1999 Zenless Zone Zero 3DMark Fortnite Elden Ring Marvel's Guardians of the Galaxy Microsoft Flight Simulator 2024 Hogwarts Legacy Street Fighter VI Starfield Teardown F1 2024 Dragon's Dogma 2 Cyberpunk 2077 |
We're comparing the Intel Arc B570 against all of its predecessors, as well as a range of similarly-priced competitor GPUs. The Radeon RX 7700 XT is really stretching the comparison a bit as that's a much more powerful AMD graphics card on paper, but as you'll see, it doesn't win every matchup. Without further ado, let's start looking at some benchmark results.
Blender 3D Rendering Benchmarks
As it turns out, using GPUs instead of CPUs to render graphics is actually a whole lot faster. (Who would've guessed?) Recent versions of Blender can use hardware acceleration on graphics cards from NVIDIA, AMD, and even Intel. Let's look at how they perform across the three standard Blender benchmark scenes.
The Arc B580 comported itself relatively well in Blender, all things considered. The Arc B570 does not hold up as well. The performance isn't broken or unusually poor, it's just not great. Then again, what do you want for $219?
Geekbench 6.3.0 GPGPU Benchmarks
Geekbench's GPGPU benchmark tests general-purpose compute workloads on GPUs using the OpenCL API. OpenCL has had some questionable driver support over the years, but it remains the most even ground on which to make this sort of comparison.
Another somewhat underwhelming result for the Arc B570 here. It's clear that this is not the card to buy if you're after intense compute performance for rendering or simulation workloads.
Geekbench AI 1.2 ML Benchmarks
A newer benchmark from Primate Labs, Geekbench AI tests a system's ability to perform AI inferencing. That's the process of actually using a pre-trained AI model, rather than creating a new model (which is called training) It supports both ONNX and OpenVINO APIs; we used the most suitable option for each card here.
AI, on the other hand, is an entirely different story. Battlemage excels at AI workloads, and this is plain to see in this benchmark. Intel's $219 GPU is basically walloping everything short of its $250 bigger brother in the quantized test is very impressive, and it holds its own quite well in the half-precision benchmark, too. Intel's after your lunch money, Team Green.
MLPerf Client LLM AI Benchmarks
Can Intel keep up its AI computation win streak? The MLPerf Client benchmark just released to the public yesterday, but we threw it into our test suite anyway. This first chart shows latency metrics, or how long it takes before the AI starts to respond. A shorter bar, in this case, is faster...
Intel's GPUs use their own native API in this test, and that could be said to give them an unfair advantage. Still, it's not as if this is a purely synthetic workload. This low latency result translates to actual low latency when doing machine learning tasks using OpenVINO on an Arc GPU. How's the throughput?
The significantly smaller compute engine aboard the B570 does mean that AI performance falls off a bit compared to the potent B580, but it's by no means a slouch. It easily outpaces both GeForce cards and all of the older Arc boards and only the B580 and the two big (and power-thirsty) Radeon chips get ahead of it.
This card isn't meant for productivity, of course. It's meant for playing video games. Let's start looking at how well it does that, shall we?
The significantly smaller compute engine aboard the B570 does mean that AI performance falls off a bit compared to the potent B580, but it's by no means a slouch. It easily outpaces both GeForce cards and all of the older Arc boards and only the B580 and the two big (and power-thirsty) Radeon chips get ahead of it.
This card isn't meant for productivity, of course. It's meant for playing video games. Let's start looking at how well it does that, shall we?
