AMD Ryzen 9 3900X Vs Intel Core i9-9900K IPC Shootout: Did AMD Close The Gap?
Cinebench, POV-Ray, LAME MT, and Y-Cruncher
|
AMD's latest CPU ever so slightly edged-out Intel's latest and greatest in the single-threaded Cinebench R20 benchmark in our full review, even though at stock speeds it's at a major clock speed deficit. However, when the playing field is leveled at 4GHz and in this new version of the test, the Ryzen 9 3900X takes a sizable 8% lead over the Core i9-9900K. Maybe these results explain why AMD touts Cinebench in all of its performance presentations.
|
Single-Threaded Performance
The Intel Core i9-9900K turns the tables this time in POV-Ray and wins by around 7.5% over the Ryzen 9 3900X. That probably shouldn't come as a surprise, since in our full Ryzen review, Intel's processor bested AMD's by around 17%, which is far more than the clock speed advantage that the 9900K enjoys at stock.
|
In this test, we created our own 223MB WAV file and converted it to the MP3 format using the multi-thread capable LAME MT application in single-threaded mode. Processing times are listed below in seconds. Shorter times equate to better performance.
Single-Thread Performance
In our original tests, the Ryzen 9 3900X lost soundly (no pun intended) to the Core i9-9900K, even in multi-threaded mode. The speedy single-threaded performance of Intel's CPU was more than the multi-threading scaling advantage on AMD's latest CPUs could overcome. The gap in single-threaded performance was around 30% there. When the CPUs are running at the same frequency in this test above, however, AMD cuts the deficit by a little less than half, though there's still a noticeable 17% difference between the two. Score this one for Intel.
|
Single-Thread Performance
Next, we'll take a look at some CPU-bound gaming tests then make some sense of all the numbers we've pored through in this review...