To isolate
CPU performance, we ran some low-resolution tests with
Novalogic's Comanche 4 and Epic's Unreal Tournament
2003. We occasionally use these tests in our evaluation of 3D
Graphics cards, but they are well suited as
processor / system bandwidth benchmarks when run at
low-resolutions with a high-end graphics card. Frame
rates in Comanche 4 and UT2003 generally scale upwards
with increased processor and memory clock speeds. To further isolate CPU
performance, we also disabled audio in the Comanche 4
test.
|
Gaming Benchmarks With The ST61G4 |
Full Powered Gaming in a Tiny Box |
|
The ST61G4 performed well
in both tests, but it couldn't quite catch our i875P
powered test system, regardless of whether or not we
used the integrated graphics or a Radeon 9800 Pro.
The Radeon 9100 IGP completed both tests without a
hitch, and posted a nice frame rate in the Unreal
Tournament benchmark, but we were using very
low-quality settings and the test was run at only
640x480. In a more realistic gaming scenario
(i.e. 1024x768 - Max Detail), UT frame rates would be
much lower. The Comanche 4 test is a bit more
graphically intensive and as a result the IGP could
only crank out 27+ frames per second. With a
Radeon 9800 Pro installed, performance in both
benchmarks was much better, but the ST61G4 still
lagged behind our Canterwood test system by about 7%.
|
"Real World" Application
Benchmarks |
The 2004 Versions Have Arrived |
|
To test
"real world" application performance, we used the
latest version of ZD's Content Creation and Business
Winstone 2004 Benchmarks. To give you an idea as
to how these benchmarks work, here's what eTesting Labs
has to say about their performance metrics.
"Business
Winstone is a system-level, application-based
benchmark that measures a PC's overall performance
when running today's top-selling Windows-based
applications on Windows 2000 (SP2 or higher) or
Windows XP. Business Winstone doesn't mimic what these
packages do; it runs real applications through a
series of scripted activities and uses the time a PC
takes to complete those activities to produce its
performance scores. (The Content Creation benchmark
uses the exact same process to derive a final score,
but a different set of applications are tested.)"
Business Winstone
Tests:
-
Microsoft
Access 2002
-
Microsoft
Excel 2002
-
Microsoft
FrontPage 2002
-
Microsoft
Outlook 2002
-
Microsoft
PowerPoint 2002
-
Microsoft
Project 2002
-
Microsoft
Word 2002
-
Norton
Antivirus Professional Edition 2003
-
WinZip 8.1
|
Content Creation
Winstone Tests:
-
Adobe
Photoshop 7.0.1
-
Adobe
Premiere 6.50
-
Macromedia
Director MX 9.0
-
Macromedia
Dreamweaver MX 6.1
-
Microsoft
Windows Media Encoder 9 Version 9.00.00.2980
-
NewTek's
LightWave 3D 7.5b
-
Steinberg
WaveLab 4.0f
|
In the Business Winstone
test, the ST61G4 finished about 5% behind the i875P
system. Switching from the Radeon 9100 IGP to a
Radeon 9800 Pro, impacted performance slightly, but if
you're looking for a SFF PC to run some basic "office
type" applications, there's no need to upgrade your
graphics - the 9100 IGP performs quite well. The
same scenario played out in the Content Creation
benchmark, but the performance delta between the i875P
and ST61G4 was slightly smaller.
We have somewhat mixed
feelings towards the ST61G4. At
$359 US ($369 for the black version), the ST61G4 is
relatively expensive when compared to other small form
factor systems. It does have one of the most
complete feature sets though, and the Radeon 9100 IGP
is the most powerful integrated graphics processor
currently available. We're also very fond of the
silver / mirrored G4 enclosure, but we feel the
ST61G4's appeal isn't as broad as some other SFF
systems out there. If you're in the market for
one of these mini-PCs, and don't plan to overclock and
want to save a few dollars by using the integrated
graphics, the ST61G4 is a fine choice. It would
make an excellent home theater PC and it's perfectly
suited for the mainstream user who doesn't plan to do
any serious gaming. Hardcore enthusiasts and overclockers however, would be better served by an XPC powered by a different chipset. The ATi
RS300 chipset was very stable and performance wasn't
bad by any means. Conversely, we think it's a revision or two
away from being considered a true alternative to the
i875 or i865, at least in our humble opinion. It's priced a
little high and its chipset is a bit immature, but
based on its aesthetics, excellent feature set and
top-notch integrated graphics, we're giving the
Shuttle ST61G4 XPC a
7.5 on the
HotHardware Heat Meter.
Discuss this or
any other Hot Hardware Review in the PC Hardware
Forum!
|