NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Review: Pascal Value And Performance Per Watt
How We Configured Our Test Systems: We tested the graphics cards in this article on a Gigabyte X99 Gaming 5P motherboard powered by an Intel Core i7-5960X octal-core processor and 16GB of Corsair DDR4 RAM. The first thing we did when configuring the test system was enter the UEFI and set all values to their "high performance" default / auto settings and disable any integrated peripherals that wouldn't be put to use. The memory's X.M.P. profile was enabled to ensure optimal memory performance and the solid state drive was then formatted and the latest build of Windows 10 Professional x64 was installed and fully updated. When the installation was complete, we installed all of the drivers, games, and benchmark tools necessary to complete our tests.
|
Hardware Used: Intel Core i7-5960X (3GHz, Octa-Core) Gigabyte X99 Gaming 5P (Intel X99 Chipset) Radeon RX 480 Radeon R9 390 Radeon R9 Nano GeForce GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 960 GeForce GTX 980 (OC) GeForce GTX 970 GeForce GTX 1070 16GB Corsair DDR4-2133 OCZ Vertex 4 Integrated Audio Integrated Network | Relevant Software: Windows 10 Pro x64 (10586) AMD Catalyst 16.6.2 NVIDIA GeForce Drivers v368.64 Benchmarks Used: Unigine Heaven v4 3DMark "Fire Strike" Thief MIddle-Earth: Shadow Of Mordor Ashes Of The Singularity Hitman 2016 LuxMark Steam VR Performance Test FRAPS |
|
The GeForce GTX 1060 performed very well in Unigine Heaving, slotting in just behind the much more expensive Radeon R9 Nano, but well ahead of the Radeon RX 480s.
|
The GeForce GTX 1060 doesn't come quite as close to the Radeon R9 Nano in the Fire Strike Ultra test, but the overall trend remains the same -- the GTX 1060 lands just behind the R9 Nano, but ahead of the Radeon R9 390 and recently-released Radeon RX 480.