| 
                       
                        
                              |  | 
                                
                                  
                                    | Performance Comparisons with 3DMark 
                                    2001SE |  
                                    | Synthetic Gaming |  |  
                      
                      Next up is 
                      3DMark 2001 SE, also created by the folks at MadOnion.  
                      Due to the fact that we are looking 
                      for more system related scores, and not looking to stress 
                      the video capabilities, we used lower resolutions than you 
                      would normally see in a graphics card review.  We ran 
                      two series of tests, one at 800x600 with 32-bit color and 
                      again at 1024x768x32, both times with all other program 
                      settings left at their defaults. 
                      
                       
                      
                      The MSI 648 Max walloped the 
                      other two boards by a margin of 600-800 points, which 
                      relates to a 5-6% difference in performance.   
                      Overclocking the system only bumped up the score by 
                      about 400 points. 
                      
                       
                      
                      The differences at 1024x768 were much less than we saw at 800x600, but still 
                      noteworthy.  There MSI 648 Max held a 3% lead over the DFI 
                      board and a 4% increase over the IWILL board. 
                        
                              |  | 
                                
                                  
                                    | Performance Comparisons with Quake 3 
                                    Arena v1.17 |  
                                    | I have the 
                                    need...the need for speed |  |  We also ran 
                      some Quake 3 Arena v1.17 Time Demo (demo001) scores at a 
                      resolution of 640X480, using 16-bit color and textures.  
                      Running Quake 3 with a high-end graphics card at this low 
                      resolution isolates motherboard and processor 
                      performance.  Frame rates are limited by the number of 
                      polygons the CPU is able to push through the bus, without 
                      being limited by the graphics subsystem. 
                      
                       
                      
                      At these minimal settings, the demo 
                      goes by in a heartbeat, and all boards came up with 
                      similar framerates except for the IWILL board, which beat out 
                      the others by close to 30 frames per second.  The MSI 
                      648 Max had a decent showing at 337.3, but we were only able to 
                      pump put an extra two frames per second when overclocking the system. 
                        
                          | 
                           
                            
                              |  | 
                                
                                  
                                    | "Real World" Performance with 
                                    the Stones |  
                                    | Simulated 
                                    Application Performance |  |  
                            Last, but not least, are 
                            two benchmarks from Ziff Davis ? Business Winstone 
                            2001 and Content Creation Winstone 2002.
 Business Winstone is an application-based benchmark, 
                            which runs through a series of scripts using 
                            business programs such as Microsoft Office 2000, 
                            FrontPage 2000, Lotus Notes and Netscape. It 
                            attempts to emulate a business system load, and then 
                            gives a rating.
 
                             
                            At default clockspeeds, 
                            the MSI 648 Max was outpaced by both of the i845 
                            powered motherboards.  When we overclocked the 
                            system, the 648 Max was able to overtake the DFI 
                            board, but Iwill's P4ES held on for the win in this 
                            test. 
                            Content Creation 
                            Winstone 2002 is another application-based 
                            benchmark, this time using popular content creation 
                            programs such as Adobe Photoshop and Premiere, 
                            Macromedia Director and Dreamweaver, and Microsoft 
                            Windows Media Encoder. It keeps these multiple 
                            applications open and switches among them while 
                            running scripts.  The time it takes to 
                            completely run the scripts is used to generate the 
                            score. 
                             
                            Using the Content 
                            Creation Winstone benchmark, the 648 Max  
                            rebounded back into the lead, and retook its place at the top of the 
                            charts.  All the scores were close, with the 
                            differences among the three boards being only 0.8.  
                            In both tests, overclocking provided a small boost 
                            in performance, about 3% in Business Winstone 2001 
                            and only just about 1.5% in Content Creation 
                            Winstone 2002. 
                            
                           
                          
                          CONCLUSION: 
                          Overall, we were pleased 
                          with the MSI 648 Max.  The SiS648 is the most 
                          feature rich, and arguably the fastest DDR chipset 
                          available for the Pentium 4.  Even though the 648 
                          brings more features to the table than most other P4 
                          chipsets, motherboards based on the 648 are relatively 
                          inexpensive.  The MSI 648 Max can be found on 
                          Pricewatch.Com for less than $100 US.  We 
                          obviously don't base our ratings on price alone 
                          though.  We had limited success when overclocking 
                          with the MSI 648 Max, and there were some minor 
                          problems with the BIOS and layout.  However, the 
                          MSI 648 Max proved to be a solid performer, leading 
                          the pack in most of the benchmarks we ran.  It 
                          was also crammed with useful features, like Gigabit 
                          LAN and 6-Channel audio.  For the money, you'd be 
                          hard pressed to find a more feature laden board from a 
                          manufacturer as well known as MSI.  We should 
                          also mention that the MSI 648 Max was very stable, and 
                          exhibited instability only while overclocked.  Based on its 
                          good performance, great price and impressive list of 
                          features, we give the MSI 648 Max an 
                          8 on the HotHardware Heat Meter. 
                            
                            
                              
                                |  
                                  
                                AGP 8x Support
                                Gigabit LAN6-channel 
                                on-board audioGreat Price 
                                  vs. Performance ratio |   
                                  No IDE RAIDDidn't 
                                  overclock well |  
                           
                          
                          Discuss This, Or 
                          Any Other Review in the PC Hardware Forum! 
                            
                        
                         |  
                        
                          | 
                          
                            | 
                        
                      
                      
                       |  
                       
                    
                     |  |