|
|
| Introduction | ||||||
While the average PC enthusiast may gawk endlessly over pages of reviews of high-end power-hungry graphics cards, jaw-slackened by the frame rates and 3DMark score that he or she might find there, at the end of the month it is the low to mid-range card that is purchased most often than not. Price typically comes into consideration, but it's not the only concern. Availability, compatibility, and other issues factor in to a buyers decision as well. Sometimes it simply boils down to the fact that the average Joe clearing stages in Peggle or watching the latest videos on YouTube simply doesn't need all of that horsepower.
ATI Avivo HD Video and Display Platform ATI Avivo Video Post Processor Two integrated DVI display outputs ATI PowerPlay Performance-on-Demand ATI CrossFireX Multi-GPU Technology
The Bundle and A Note On Overclocking: |
| Inspection of the Diamond Viper HD 3650 1GB |
Diamond's Viper HD 3650 1GB is small and compact like most of the other models out there, unburdened by large heatsinks, fans, etc. With its emphasis on price and low power consumption, the smaller footprint of this card makes it ripe for using in the close quarters of a SFF or other Home Theater oriented PC where high-res gaming is not a primary concern. The front and back of the card is mostly left open - very little in the way of power regulation or other circuitry is visible. Ruby appears to be relaxing a bit on the graphic label stickered over the rear-mounted heatsink/fan. It's almost as if she was taking a breather from the typical strenous output she deals with in the upper end HD38xx models. Quite noticeable is the lack of both CrossFire and power connectors, as this Radeon HD 3650's CrossFire and power is supplied by the PCI-Express slot. The heatsink and fan are quite small, mounted over the RV635 and the four memory chips located on the front. As the HD 3650 consumes little power compared to some of the more powerful cards, it generates a lot less heat and doesn't need a heavy-duty solution. Of course, the profile is quite slim and only requires a single slot in your chassis for installation. Small thermal pads connect the heatsink to the memory ICs below. The remaining four memory chips reside on the backside of the card, uncooled, surrounding a metal bracket used to hold down the heatsink. The memory consists of Hynix DDR2, and is rated for 2.5ns operation at CAS settings of 6-6-6. This is most definitely not the most expensive RAM floating around, and a perfect fit for Diamond when adding an entire gigabyte. The bracket features three kinds of video connections: VGA, DVI, and HDMI. These should cover almost all users current needs for connecting their PC to a monitor. |
| Base System and 3DMark06 Results | ||||||||||||||
HOW WE CONFIGURED THE TEST SYSTEMS: We tested all of the graphics cards used in this article on an MSI P6N Diamond motherboard powered by a Core 2 Duo E6550 processor and 2GB of low-latency Corsair RAM. The first thing we did when configuring our test system was to enter into the BIOS and set all values to their "optimized" or "performance" default settings. Then we manually configured the memory timings and disabled any integrated peripherals that wouldn't be put to use. The hard drive was then formatted, and Windows Vista Ultimate was installed. When the installation was complete we fully updated the OS, and installed the latest DX10 redist and various hotfixes along with the necessary drivers and applications.
HARDWARE USED: RELEVANT SOFTWARE:
Diamond's HD 3650 finds itself with the short end of the stick in the 3DMark06 testing with by far the lowest scores of any of the cards used for this review. The real crux here is that Diamond's version of the card comes with double the memory buffer than Sapphire's model, yet the slower DDR2 memory speeds employed cause it to lose any advantage whatsoever. Instead, it winds up being nearly 30% slower as shown in the overall results graph. |
| Half-Life 2: Episode 2 | ||||||
Thankfully, the Diamond HD 3650 1GB performs a bit better in actual gaming engines than in the synthetic 3DMark06 benchmark. The frame rates may not be outstanding by any means, but we're still looking at close to 30fps at both resolutions - and that's with four samples of Anti-Aliasing and Anistropic Filtering being applied to the rendering workload. |
| Company of Heroes | ||||||
Company of Heroes' in-game benchmark is much more grueling that the Half-Life 2 demo, as is evident by the low frame rates found during the 8600 GTS and HD 3850 testing. The 8600 GTS even drops to single digits at 1600x1200. The two HD 3650s are somewhat evenly matched here with just over a frame per second separating the two at the 1280x1024, and almost identical runs at the higher res. |
| Enemy Territory: Quake Wars | ||||||
Whereas the Sapphire HD 3650 and Gigabyte's 8600 GTS are nearly deadlocked for the value-gaming spot in our charts, Diamond's card begins to fall out of the picture starting with the ET: Quake Wars testing. Its slower clock and memory speeds simply prevent it from dealing with the others head-on, slipping behind in performance to the tune of 25% or more. |
| Crysis Demo | ||||||
There's no denying that Crysis is one of the most demanding games on current PC hardware, and even our mainstream 8800 GT is barely able to get to the 30 fps mark under these conditions. The Diamond HD 3650's single-digit frame rates are a far cry from anything even coming close to playable - one would seriously need to cut back on the resolution or quality settings to get even close, but then what would be the point?
|
| Bioshock | ||||||
Eerily similar to our ET: Quake Wars results, Bioshock has the 8600 GTS and Sapphire's HD 3650 battling it out for the middle ground. Each card wins a round here, with a frame separating the two at either resolution. Unfortunately for Diamond, its card is again dead last. Behind by 5-6 frames per second at 1280x1024, the gap actually widens at 1600x1200 to 6-7 fps when we would have expected otherwise. The larger memory buffer should have helped here, but its slower DDR2 memory interface speed hampers any gains it might have had. |
| PT Boats: Knights of the Sea | ||||||
The "Storm" engine is especially brutal on the weaker cards, with the 8600 GTS showing the most anemic results of any in this group. The Radeon HD 3650s do fare a little better, almost doubling the 8600 GTS' output, but with a large disparity between the two competitors. The Sapphire HD 3650 is giving us from 33-40% better frame rates than Diamond's sample.
|
| Performance Summary and Conclusion | ||||
Performance Summary:
If their gamble was to increase the memory buffer in lieu of any speed tweaks, than we have to say that Diamond lost this bet. Placing 1GB of 400MHz DDR2 memory on board the HD 3650 1GB model effectively dropped performance well below that of a rival card from Sapphire. On the bright side, Diamond's card did manage to compete head-to-head with an 8600 GTS from Gigabyte, that sells for a $30 - $40 premium.
|