|
|
| Introduction, Specs and Features | ||||||
By now, we assume just about everyone knows the GeForce 8800 GT's story. NVIDIA launched the 512MB 8800 GT in late October of last year and touted a price range of $200-250. But retail prices initially ended up being over $300 due to supply issues. You can bet that ATI was smiling a couple weeks later when the company launched the Radeon HD 3850 and 3870 and retail stock was available closer to MSRP prices. NVIDIA hit back, though, by launching the 256MB version of the 8800 GT and getting more stock onto store shelves. It goes without saying that NVIDIA wanted this 256MB part to remain closer to those original $200-250 price claims. You may be wondering what the differences are between the 256MB and 512MB 8800 GTs, besides the amount of memory of course. The two cards have the same number of stream processors (112), same reference core clock (600 MHz), same reference shader clock (1.5 GHz), and the same 256-bit memory bus. The difference is in the memory clock: the 256MB reference memory clock is 1.4 GHz while the 512MB reference memory speed is 1.8 GHz. Most of you are probably already familiar with XFX, and if so, you know that the company consistently offers some of the best factory overclocks on the market. One such overclock can be found in XFX's new 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition card. The card's core is overclocked to 650 MHz, and its memory is boosted to 800 MHz (1.6 GHz DDR). To see just how well this Alpha Dog performs, we're going to pit it against an arsenal of competitors, including a reference Radeon HD 3850, a reference 8800 GT 256MB, and a reference 8800 GT 512MB. Read on to see how it fares.
|
| Closer Look: 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition | ||||
Just like the box, the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition card itself sports the mug of a tough looking dog thanks to a custom decal applied by XFX. The color scheme, black and green, is typical of current XFX cards. We know looks don't help performance, but we can't help but think this is a cool looking card. In the second picture below, you can see the back of the card, which reveals all of the screws that secure the cooler and gives you a nice view of the black PCB.
|
| Test System and Test Results with 3DMark06 | ||||||||||||||
For testing the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition, we used an Intel Core 2 Duo E6400 on an Abit Fatal1ty FP-IN9 SLI motherboard. We also used 2GB of Corsair DDR2 (TWIN2X1024A-5400UL) RAM and a 120GB Maxtor SATA hard drive. The 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition was compared to an NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT, an NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 256MB, an NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512MB, an ATI Radeon HD 3850 and an ATI Radeon X1950 Pro. Note: Because we are using both DirectX 9 and DirectX 10 capable cards, we will not be enabling DX10 effects in the DX10 games in order to provide an apples to apples comparison.
The 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition started things off just where we thought it would: a little better than the reference 8800 GT 256MB, better than the reference Radeon HD 3850, and not quite as good as the 8800 GT 512MB. The Shader Model 3.0 / HDR test results were the most interesting as the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition's boosted clocks helped it gain around a 300 point lead on both the 8800 GT 256MB and the Radeon HD 3850. |
| Test Results with Company of Heroes | ||||||
At 1280x1024, the top four cards perform pretty similarly, except for the Radeon HD 3850 which slips over 15 FPS behind the pack when anti-aliasing is enabled. At 1600x1200, though, we have to thank the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition's factory overclock for allowing it to perform quite a bit better than the Radeon HD 3850 and the 8800 GT 256MB. The XXX Alpha Dog can't quite keep up with the 512MB 8800 GT, though. |
| Test Results with ET: Quake Wars | ||||||
As you can see, the more interesting results here are once again at the 1600x1200 resolution. What is odd is that the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition puts up a really great score (compared to its competitors) with no anti-aliasing (AA) and no anisotropic filtering (AF), but once 4x AA and 8x AF are enabled, the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition takes a huge hit. Neither the 8800 GT 512MB nor the Radeon HD 3850 take as significant of a hit (not even close really). We ran the test a few extra times just to make sure we were getting the correct results. We're not sure what caused the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition's performance to drop so much at the higher resolution one AA was enabled, but we suspect its smaller frame buffer we being taxed. |
| Test Results with with Half-Life 2: Episode 2 | ||||||
The only result that was surprising at 1280x1024 was the No AA / No AF score of the Radeon HD 3850. At that setting, it smoked the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition, along with all the other cards. On the other hand, once 4x AA / 8x AF and HDR were turned on, the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition surged back and beat the Radeon HD 3850 in addition to the 8800 GT 256MB by a respectable margin. At 1600x1200 4x AA / 8x AF / HDR, the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition decided to beat down the Radeon HD 3850 and 8800 GT 256MB a little bit more. At either resolution, though, the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition can't quite keep up with the 8800 GT 512MB. |
| Test Results with Crysis | ||||||
Crysis can really murder a system, and it apparently really likes to have a frame buffer size of at least 512MB, which is not surprising since Crysis is such a demanding game. The 8800 GT 512MB puts the hurt on the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition, as well as the rest of the lot. |
| Overclocking the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition | ||||
Since the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition is already overclocked out of the box, it is bound to have more headroom, right? Well, in typical HotHardware fashion, we set out to answer just that question. And the answer was "yes." Our sample did indeed have more overclocking headroom, as we were able to push the core to from 650 MHz to 720 MHz and the memory from 800 MHz to 920 MHz. We were pretty happy with this overclock, but you should keep in mind that not all cards will overclock the same. In short, your mileage may vary.
You can look at the performance charts above to get an idea of how much better the 720 / 920 overclock performed. We thought the overclocked Half-Life 2: Episode 2 score at 1280x1024 4x AA / 8x AF / HDR was especially nice. |
| Performance Summary and Conclusion | ||||
Performance Summary: Overall, the XFX 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition's performance was quite good. The card outperformed the Radeon HD 3850 in most cases and was only slightly behind the 8800 GT 512MB in many cases. XFX has a solid offering with its 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition. For the most part, it outperforms the 256MB Radeon HD 3850, and it manages to stay within striking distance of the 512MB 8800 GT in many cases. The only thing that makes us pause before recommending this card is the current retail pricing situation for mid-range cards. It's kind of confusing and hard to keep it all straight at the moment. At the beginning of this article, we spoke about the price of GeForce 8800 GTs, Radeon HD 3850s and 3870s. If we check current price levels of 512MB 8800 GTs, they can be found for around $250-280 or so. The Radeon HD 3870s, which also have 512MB of memory, are running between $230 and $280. The 256MB Radeon HD 3850 is on sale for as little as $170, while nicer, overclocked versions easily push $200 or so. The XFX 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition, on the other hand, is available from $230. We do not envy anyone with a $170-250 video card budget right now. While we suspect prices on the 256MB will continue to come down, we're not sure how soon that will be. Regardless, we do think you should at least take a closer look at the XFX 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition if it is within your budget, and you are shopping for a new card. If you want to game at resolutions higher than 1600x1200 and/or love to crank up the eye candy, especially with newer games like Crysis, then we think you'll want to save up for a 512MB card, like one of XFX's 512MB 8800 GTs. Otherwise, if your budget can't stretch any further than $230, the XFX 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition is definitely worthy of your consideration. With its practical bundle, excellent performance, and Double Lifetime Warranty, the 8800 GT 256MB XXX Alpha Dog Edition is not likely to disappoint.
|