|
|
| Introduction and Specifications | |||
NVIDIA's GeForce 9 Series was first introduced in February of this year by way of the 9600 GT launch. Admittedly, we thought it was interesting to see a new GeForce series launch, not with the flagship card, but rather with a new midrange offering. It makes perfect sense, though, considering that more people can afford midrange cards than can afford high-end, flagship cards. Since this launch, NVIDIA has added to the GeForce 9 Series by introducing the dual-GPU GeForce 9800 GX2 and the GeForce 9800 GTX. So far, the GeForce 9 Series seems to be another successful line from the NVIDIA camp. In this article, we are going to expand our coverage of the GeForce 9600 GT by doing another round-up of three retail cards: the PNY Verto 9600 GT, the MSI N9600GT OC, and the ASUS EN9600GT SILENT. As you might expect, all three of these cards sport 512MB of GDDR3 and a 256-bit memory interface. What you may not expect is how different these three cards actually are. Two feature custom coolers, one of which is passive, making it silent. Because of these custom coolers, these two cards are dual-slot solutions while the third uses the single-slot reference cooler. Only one of them ships with a factory overclock while the other two utilize NVIDIA's reference clocks. We are eager to see how these three cards compare when it comes to performance, noise and heat. Let's jump right in and take a look at the specifications of all three side-by-side.
As you can see, the MSI N9600GT OC sports a slight overclock of 700 MHz for the core clock, 1,900 MHz for the memory clock, and 1,680 MHz for the shader clock, while the PNY Verto 9600 GT and ASUS EN9600GT SILENT ship with no overclock (which puts them at the reference speeds of 650 MHz, 1,800 MHz, and 1,625 MHz, respectively). All three cards support the PCI Express 2.0 interface, 2-way SLI and DirectX 10. Each card sports two dual-link DVI outputs, one HDTV/S-video output, and a 6-pin PCI Express power connector. |
| Closer Look at the Cards |
The first card we are going to show you here is the PNY Verto 9600 GT. As you can see in the images below, this card doesn't differ significantly from NVIDIA's reference design.
The single-slot cooler features a small yet relatively quiet fan that works with the heatsink to do a respectable job keeping the GPU cool. At idle, the temperature reported for the GPU was 43°C. During the 3DMark06 benchmark, the temperature rose to 62°C. Our overclocking results with the Verto 9600 GT were similar to our previous 9600 GT attempts. We were able to reach 750 MHz for the core and 2,200 MHz for the memory, which is not too shabby. Next up, we have the MSI N9600GT OC, which doesn't look much like the NVIDIA reference design at all. The cooler is red and features a bigger fan. Additionally, this is a two-slot solution rather than single-slot.
Like the PNY offering, the MSI bundle is simple, but it's not the same. The N9600GT OC bundle includes an installation CD, a general MSI video card quick user's guide, a N9600GT series quick user's guide, a DVI-to-VGA adapter, a DVI-to-HDMI adapter, an S-video cable, an HDTV (component video) break-out cable, a "Y" adapter power cable, and an audio cable for use with HDMI (connects from a header on the card to an S/PDIF header on your motherboard or sound card). One more aspect of the bundle worth mentioning is that MSI also includes a bunch of handy utilities on the installation CD. If you assumed that the MSI N9600GT OC's cooler does a better job cooling the GPU than the PNY's reference cooler, then you assumed correctly. At idle, the N9600GT OC's GPU temperature was 39°C. During 3DMark06, the temperature hit 53°C, which was 9°C cooler than the PNY's reference design. Thanks to its more efficient cooler, the N9600GT OC overclocked a bit better as well. While we achieved the same memory overclock (2,200 MHz), we were able to push the core clock 50 MHz higher, resulting in an 800 MHz core. What's more, the cooler is at least as quiet as the PNY's reference cooler at idle and during load. Nevertheless, we have to point out that the N9600GT OC is very loud during boot and POST, but the fan quiets down once the login prompt appears and the driver are initialized. Finally, the last card in this round-up is the ASUS EN9600GT SILENT, which also departs quite a bit from the NVIDIA reference design. As the name suggests, this card is completely silent thanks to its fanless, passive design. The quiet approach is always appealing, but the downside here is that the design results in a two-slot wide card.
The EN9600GT SILENT package includes a quick setup guide, a VGA driver/utility CD, a multi-language manual CD, an "HDMI Adapter / SPDIF Cable Connection Instruction" booklet, a DVI-to-VGA adapter, a DVI-to-HDMI adapter, an HDTV (component video) break-out cable, a "Y" adapter power cable, and an audio cable for use with HDMI (connects from a header on the card to an S/PDIF header on your motherboard or sound card). Some silent coolers can actually do as good of a job as or better than fan-based coolers, but that didn't prove to be the case here. Both the PNY card with its reference cooler and the MSI card with its custom cooler do a better (albeit noisier of course) job at keeping the GPU cool. At idle, the ASUS EN9600GT SILENT runs at about 60°C, and during 3DMark06, the GPU temperature reached 75°C. The silent cooler also didn't allow us to overclock the EN9600GT SILENT as high as the other two cards. The high stable overclock we reached was 725 MHz for the core and 2,000 MHz for the memory.
|
| Test System and 3DMark Vantage | ||||||||||
We'll start things off by taking a look at performance in Futuremark's latest 3D rendering benchmark application - 3DMark Vantage. For more information on 3DMark Vantage, check out our launch article.
For the most part, the 3DMark Vantage results are right in line with our expectations. Since the MSI N9600GT OC is overclocked it outperforms reference clocked PNY Verto 9600 GT and ASUS EN9600GT SILENT by a small margin, and all three cards are bested by the 512MB GeForce 8800 GT (with the odd exception of GPU Test 2). Furthermore, all three 9600 GTs post better numbers than the 256MB Radeon HD 3850. |
| Futuremark 3DMark06 | ||||||
These results are very similar to the 3DMark Vantage results. The main difference is that the margins separating the cards aren't quite as big. The ASUS EN9600GT SILENT suprised us a bit, though, considering it managed to outperform the PNY Verto 9600 GT despite the fact that both cards sport the same clock speeds. |
| Company of Heroes | ||||||
Once again, there really aren't any shocking results here. Thanks to its factory overclock, the MSI N9600GT OC edges out the other two 9600 GTs, but none of the cards can keep up with the GeForce 8800 GT 512MB, especially as the rendering load becomes more demanding.
Across the board, the performance drops significantly in Company of Heroes when DirectX 10 is used. Still, trend-wise, the results are similar to the DirectX 9 results. |
| Enemy Territory: Quake Wars | ||||||
The GeForce 8800 GT 512MB didn't want to cooperate with our ETQW benchmark for an unknown reason. We ran this test several extra times to confirm our results, and they were the same every time. Our theory is that the problem is driver related, but we didn't dive too deep into it since our main focus is how the three 9600 GTs perform against each other. As you can see, the MSI card takes a very slight lead, and the 256MB Radeon HD 3850 doesn't even threaten the 9600 GTs. |
| Half-Life 2: Episode 2 | ||||||
Continuing to meet our expectations, the MSI N9600GT OC again outperforms the PNY Verto 9600 GT and ASUS EN9600GT SILENT by a small margin. All three cards are right on the heals of the 512MB GeForce 8800 GT. |
| Crysis | ||||||
We aren't sure what happened here with the GeForce 8800 GT 512MB at 1024x768. Nevertheless, if you are considering acquiring a GeForce 9600 GT in the near future, these results have to make you smile. Logic would suggest that the GeForce 8800 GT 512MB would outpace all of the 9600 GTs, but all three of the 9600 GTs hold their own or even barely beat the 8800 GT 512MB.
The DirectX 10 results were a little more in line with our expectations, but all three of the 9600 GTs still kept up with the 8800 GT 512MB. |
| Performance Summary and Conclusion | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Performance Summary: When we compare just the three GeForce 9600 GTs in this round-up, the performance summary is relatively clear. The two 9600 GTs with reference clocks (the ASUS EN9600GT SILENT and the PNY Verto 9600 GT) are just a bit slower than the overclocked MSI N9600GT OC in most of the testing that we performed. It didn't take much logic to expect these results, though. What impressed us was how well the GeForce 9600 GTs fared against the GeForce 8800 GT 512MB.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||