OCZ RevoDrive Hybrid PCI Express SSD Review

14 thumbs up

Next we ran the three drives through a battery of tests in PCMark Vantage from Futuremark Corp. We specifically used only the HDD Test module of this benchmark suite to evaluate all of the drives we tested. Feel free to consult Futuremark's white paper on PCMark Vantage for an understanding of what each test component entails and how it calculates its measurements. For specific information on how the HDD Test module arrives at its performance measurements, we'd encourage you to read pages 35 and 36 of the white paper.

Futuremark's PCMark Vantage
http://www.futuremark.com

We really like PCMark Vantage's HDD Performance for its real-world application measurement approach to testing. From simple Windows Vista start-up performance to data streaming from a disk drive in a game engine and video editing with Windows Movie Maker, we feel confident that these tests best illustrate the real performance profile of our SSDs in an end user/consumer PC usage model.

 

The OCZ RevoDrive Hybrid put up mixed numbers in the PCMark Vantage storage benchmarks. In its first run after enabling the SSD cache, the RevoDrive Hybrid showed some marginal improvements in performance over the HD alone. But once we got to the third run, performance increased dramatically in a few of the tests and the RevoDrive hybrid was able to outrun even the Vertex 3 in the WMC benchmark. Overall, however, while performance did go up quite a bit, it was only a in a few of the tests that the RevoDrive hybrid was able to significantly outpace the also-hybrid Momentus XT and the Intel SRT setup was faster in most tests.

Article Index:

+1
+ -

"I like that OCZ has a solution to meet the needs of all types of workloads and price. I also like the speeds, and the speeds improvements as time goes on and caches what's most vital. I don't have much to say, If it fits your needs and you can afford it, Go ahead , the article is pretty clear. I just have a couple of questions to satisfy my curiosity. 1. Does the use of the PCIE X4 cuts into the GPU bandwidth?, and two, in case of SSD failure, is it possible to detach and use the Hard Drive to boot normally, seems to have some sort of proprietary connection. And one more, is the HD Sata 2 or 3, just asking." *Answered*

"I also hope to see soon, what *Synapse* will bring to the table."

0
+ -

Good review Marco. It's a nice drive and has decent storage capacity for the price. I also like that it's adaptive to your usage over time. Installing it as my boot drive would be OK with a TB of space to consider.

These drives seem to be morphing into new and better products at a fast clip. What was there just a year ago, and how much did it cost?

What is to seen in the coming year? Ha-Ha!

Reading these reviews you guys do is like riding a information train around. We never stop learning.

0
+ -

Great Review Marco it's good to see OCZ pushing the envelope with this 1TB drive.

0
+ -

Nice review. I would have to say that reading it, I was disappointed by the results (especially in gaming) but I was also surprised that it was able to beat out a Seagate Momentus XL Hybrid drive, considering the potential it once shows. $500 dollars is nice but with all of the SSD's appearing on the daily deals and with us already having 2GB hard drives to store our stuff on, I still think the hybrid solution is best (seeing as how it has higher marks in everything including gaming.)

Still, nice review. Nice that you push these limits and give out all the details, just... nice!

0
+ -

how come you guys will not use faster ssd's, like the Mushkin Chronos Deluxe 60gb with SRT? I run the Mushkin with a slow rpm 500gb hard drive and i get this:-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CrystalDiskMark 3.0.1 x64 (C) 2007-2010 hiyohiyo

Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

* MB/s = 1,000,000 byte/s [SATA/300 = 300,000,000 byte/s]

Sequential Read : 374.525 MB/s

Sequential Write : 114.383 MB/s

Random Read 512KB : 351.614 MB/s

Random Write 512KB : 114.315 MB/s

Random Read 4KB (QD=1) : 17.912 MB/s [ 4373.0 IOPS]

Random Write 4KB (QD=1) : 53.859 MB/s [ 13149.2 IOPS]

Random Read 4KB (QD=32) : 81.831 MB/s [ 19978.2 IOPS]

Random Write 4KB (QD=32) : 105.460 MB/s [ 25747.0 IOPS]

Test : 4000 MB [C: 75.0% (349.4/465.7 GB)] (x5)

Date : 2011/11/01 12:17:04

OS : Windows 7 Home Premium Edition SP1 [6.1 Build 7601] (x64)

on my first run!

0
+ -

i saw a review on another site (to remain unnamed) and they came up with a very different out come but as i was reading there version i kept thinking these people don't know what there doing for one they could not get it to install and then the software gave them trouble again and again .

the performancee was way down with pretty much the same comparisons as Marco used so i knew i had to come over to HH and find out the truth because i run the revo and its much better then what they say the revo hybrid is.

thanks again for a great review Marco

i want one but already have the revo & ocz solid 3 and they work just fine for me

Login or Register to Comment
Post a Comment
Username:   Password: