NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Mainstream GPU

4 thumbs up

As we mentioned in our coverage of the recently released GTX-series, much of NVIDIA's recent marketing has centered around the notion that GPUs aren't just for gaming any longer.  Of course, we've known this to be true for quite some time, but there definitely seems to be more happening in the GPGPU arena as of late.  NVIDIA has also been showing off a number of applications that all benefit from the power of a GPU, and none of them were games.




The application you see pictured above is a beta, pre-release version of Elemental Technologies’ BadaBOOM.  BadaBOOM takes advantage of ETI’s GPU-powered RapiHD Video Platform to offload video encoding duties from the CPU, onto the GPU, to accelerate the process of converting standard-definition video from any format to H.264 for portable media devices, like an iPod, Zune, or iPhone.





A new version of the Folding @ Home client was also recently released which uses NVIDIA GPUs for its calculations. This version of the Folding @  Home client running on a GeForce GTX 280, for example, can processes roughly 500ns / day. That is a massive speed increase compared to existing CPU and previous GPU architectures.  A typical CPU can do about 4ns / day, a PS3 about 100, and Radeon HD 3870 approximately 170.

And of course we can't forget PhysX.  If you remember, NVIDIA acquired AGEIA not too long ago and plans to incorporate PhysX support into all CUDA capable (GeForce 8, 9, and GTX 200 series) graphics cards.  We've done some testing of NVIDIA's beta PhysX-capable driver and even at this relatively early stage everything seemed to work well. Official support for PhysX should be coming in a future driver revision, due out on August 5.

Article Index:

0
+ -

 I'm having a hard time figuring out why they would even offer this product.  The 9600GSO is only a few pennies more and has the same (sometimes better) performance.  I'm all about consumer choice, but the $80~$100 range is getting a bit over-crowded.

0
+ -

1nteljunki3:

 I'm having a hard time figuring out why they would even offer this product.  The 9600GSO is only a few pennies more and has the same (sometimes better) performance.  I'm all about consumer choice, but the $80~$100 range is getting a bit over-crowded.

Crowded indeed. I am assuming that's because this segment is where thay are making most of their money. A GTX 280 creates a lot of hype and sells cards but I'm willing to bet that for each 280 sold they sell a great deal more lower end cards. It's all about the numbers. I guess they are shooting for the consumer who is looking for the lowest price no matter what.

 

Edit: I'll have to look at the reviews for the GSO. I can't see how it could be faster. It has less memory (Usually), smaller pipes and slower clocks. All things considered the GSO should be slower. The GSO is also less than the GT, not more.

 

 

 

 

0
+ -

Great article by the way. Not everyone can afford the latest and greatest and having reviews like this help a lot of people with their buying decisions. Not to mention helps the guys like me who get questions about this stuff.

Well written. I was glad to see you mentioned power and noise. I get a lot of questions about noise these days and it's good to be able to tell the customers something.

 

0
+ -

mainstream..?
i thought mainstream was either integrated e.g. 9500m
or cheap gamer gpus e.g. 9600gt

i really don't see a point for another cheaper card when you can find 9600gt for around $100 now...

0
+ -

Because there are people who can't aford the $110 (Newegg's curresnt cheapest price) for a 9600GT. The 9500GT is for the sub $80 market.

Login or Register to Comment
Post a Comment
Username:   Password: