

Even if Sony does kill the XEL-1 in the US, all is not lost. LG has given notice that it's bringing its 15" EL9500 display to the United States with an estimated price tag of ~$2600. While that's still extremely expensive, the EL9500 can handle 720p video (1366x768 resolution) and has nearly twice the viewable area (96.14 inches2 for the LG as opposed to 51.7 inches2 for the Sony. LG has hinted that it will introduce 20" and possibly even 30" OLED panels this year with 40" panels coming Real Soon Now, but given the historic inaccuracy of such predictions, we're not holding our breath. |
Have they come up with a practical solution to the burn-in problem? I seem to recall other OLED products suffering horribly from burn-in. |
|
3vi1, Did some digging on this. As with plasma and original LCDs, burn-in appears to have been gradually reduced over time. Back in September a company claimed to have found a method for preventing it (no idea if this is true or not). |
|
I personally would much rather see a quality OLED display than a 3D one. The concept of 3D in a home seems very limited to me. I think it will be kind of like Blueray, with a wow this is the best thing in the world but we only have 3-5 movies (at the initial release). |
|
I thought we were much closer to OLED TVs...considering the Zune HD sports the technology at a relatively affordable price. For the greatest aspect of OLED has been the vast energy savings (particularly useful in handheld electronics and laptops). Compared to the 11 inch Sony OLED TV, the 15" LG counterpart is a bargain at $2,500. |
|
Sony like to think there electronics are Gucci electronics. I am not saying there not quality pieces, as they are. It is just that so are many of the others. One thing that really stinks about this is that Sony supplies screens to many other suppliers than just Sony. So if OLED is dead at Sony it's the same at several other market holders from what I understand. |
|
Gibbersome, Let me explain why it doesn't work that way. The Zune HD has a 3.3" screen at a 16:9 aspect ratio. Total screen area is 4.65 square inches. The XEL-1 is 51.7 square inches. That makes the XEL-1 eleven times larger than the Zune HD. Finally, consider the LG model. At 96 inches and change, it's 85% larger than the XEL-1, and 20.6x as large as the Zune HD. Here's why that matters so much. Because OLEDs are difficult to manufacture, we can assume that the defect density--the number of defects per square inch--is relatively high—certainly much, much, higher than LCD. If this is the case, OLED prices would follow a normal price curve from small sizes to the largest size below the defect density point. If you're buying 4.65" screens and averaging one defect per five square inches, that's no problem. If you're trying to build 20" screens, that's a huge problem. This is why the cost jumps like a rocket, and it's why we aren't seeing any large OLEDs on the market even for insane amounts of money. At some point, Sony and the other manufacturers looked at how much it would cost to bring these products out, and decided they couldn't build them in enough volume to be worth it yet. |