|
|
| Design and Features | ||||
The OCZ Flex XLC modules definitely stands out in a crowd due to their unique cooling system. While the actual memory chip PCB is standard sized, when the cooling system is added, the overall module height is roughly double a standard module. The height is similar to Corsair's "Dominator" modules, although OCZ's unique cooler design certainly separates themselves away from Corsair, and well, everyone else on the market as well. The cooler works in multiple ways, which is the beauty of this particular design. The heatsink design is efficient enough to cool the module without specifically needing water cooling. OCZ combines a heat-spreader on one side of the module along with a larger heatsink on the other side, both of which connect to a series of fins at the top of the unit to help dissipate heat. Even the water-barbs help to dissipate heat when the water cooling system is not in use. Without water-cooling even being thrown into the mix, these modules can run at their intended clock speeds and latency levels just fine.
While you don't have to use water cooling with these modules, it's hard to imagine most end users buying modules with integrated water cooling support and not using it. Each module has a 1/4" (inner diameter) water barb on both ends of the unit, which allows a simple path of water to stream through the inside of the heatsink, taking heat away along with it. Even while water is flowing through the module, the heatsinks on the top and side of the module also help dissipate heat, making for a very efficient overall design. Water cooling, again, is not required, but will certainly will help lower module and PCB temperatures while aiding in potential overclocking.
We were able to run the modules at their intended CAS 3-4-4-15 timings at 800 MHz with straight air cooling, as expected, and showed absolutely no ill effects. However, in order to reach these timings, we had to bump up the voltage to 2.2V. The stock voltage which OCZ recommends is 2.1V, but at this level, our benchmarks would crash almost immediately at 3-4-4 timings. However, a slight bump up to 2.2V made our system rock solid stable, and we were able to run through all of our benchmarks without crashing, and we were also able to overclock quite a bit at this level as well. OCZ has EVP (Extended Voltage Protection) with these modules, which allows you to bump them up to 2.4V and maintain your lifetime warranty, certainly a nice feature to consider when overclocking. |
| Water Cooling | ||
We used 3/8 outside diameter - 1/4" inner diameter tubing for our tests, which were connected to a dedicated water cooling system. Other water blocks were taken out of the loop, although in most real world scenarios, the water-cooling system would be used to also cool the CPU and GPU along with the memory modules. We wish OCZ would have included some sort of clamping system for when the tube is attached. Even though our tubing created a tight seal around the barb, it would be nice to have an additional protection method with water flowing next to expensive memory modules. For safety's sake, adding a small zip-tie helped our peace of mind. We did not experience any leaks with the OCZ memory kit, even without additional security measures in place.
The modules are designed in such a way that they will not impede on the space of the module slot next to them. As you can see, water flows into the primary module, which is connected via a short tube to the next module, which flows water back out to the cooling system. You could certainly purchase two of these kits (four modules total) and water-cool all of them. It would likely look quite impressive, as well.
For thermal testing, we used an infrared probe to measure the external heatsink temperature, PCB temperature of the memory module, and the PCB temperature of the surrounding motherboard. We wanted to see if the water cooling system helped to extract heat from the module itself, along with how this affected the overall motherboard temperatures.
As you can see, adding water cooling to the mix helps temperatures all around. With our water cooling system active, the memory modules were actually cool to the touch during intensive benchmarking and stress testing. Without the water cooling , the modules were warm (but not hot) to the touch. While the water cooling system is quite simplistic, it's also highly effective at removing heat generated by the memory. |
| Overclocking | ||||
We first tested module overclockability using air-cooling, just to see how far we could take them before adding the more efficient water cooling element into the mix. As we mentioned before, the modules run at 800 MHz at CAS 3-4-4-15 @ 2.2V, which was our starting point. Our first step was to go down in terms of latency. Surprisingly, the modules were able to clock down to CAS 3-3-3-12 @ 800 MHz at 2.2V, which is the lowest latency we've seen to date on a DDR2-800 module. The module would not run at 1T timing, but this is somewhat standard with most larger capacity modules. After an impressive start, we got to pushing up clock speeds.
At the same 2.2V voltage level, we were able to push our DDR2-800 modules up to an impressive DDR2-1142 level at CAS 5-5-5-15 latencies, nearly the same timings of OCZ's far more expensive Flex XLC DDR2 modules. With one final push, we cranked the voltage level up to 2.3V and got even further. At this level, we were able to clock our modules up to DDR2-1155 speeds at CAS 5-5-5-15 latencies. Perhaps even more impressive is that we were able to run these modules also at DDR2-1066 speeds at CAS 4-4-4-12 latencies when at this voltage level. Our screenshot shows 4-4-4-15, but we were able to push this further down to -12 in our next set of benchmarks.
While water cooling did improve our module temperatures by quite a lot, it did not help the overclockability much. We were not able to achieve higher overclocks or lower latencies with water cooling over traditional air cooling. However, when running at these ultra high levels, we would feel much comfortable for long term operation with a water cooling system opposed to air due to the much lower temperatures all around. We should also note that every pair of modules is different, and we're not assuming that every pair of Flex XLC modules will overclock as well as ours did. These modules overclocked very well, delivering the same clock speeds and latencies as much more expensive modules. |
| Sandra Performance | ||||||||
At stock speeds (800 MHz @ CAS 3-4-4-15), these modules deliver a smidge better memory performance compared to most enthusiast class DDR2-800 modules (which typically run at CAS 4-4-4-15). We also documented the performance of the modules when overclocked. Cranking these modules up to much higher levels (without overclocking the CPU) didn't help memory bandwidth too much, but does improve latency by quite a bit. |
| PCMark and 3DMark Performance | ||||
The additional memory speeds and lower latencies helped PCMark performance, but did nothing for 3DMark, which was limited by the graphics card. These tests were done on a board which can adjust memory frequencies independent of the front side bus, so it's interesting to see how little memory speeds affect real-world performance in a confined environment. Please keep in mind, however, that increasing the memory speed while also overclocking the CPU and FSB would yield better results. |
| Gaming Performance | ||||
Half Life 2 shows a nice slope of performance gain as memory speeds increase. Prey shows smaller increases, but increases nonetheless. Gaming environments tend to show better performance with lower latency modules when CPU and FSB overclocking are not part of the equation, which make these OCZ low-latency modules a pretty nice fit for gaming boxes. |
| Conclusion | ||||
Our Conclusion: With the release of their Flex XLC modules, OCZ is offering a product which is substantially more flexible than most other enthusiast class memory modules on the market. They can be air-cooled or water-cooled. They'll run at lower clock speeds with tight timings, or at high clock speeds with more relaxed timings. The Flex XLC modules are unique, efficient, and from what we've seen thus far, the pricing is in line with other high-end modules. While our initial reaction was to question the concept of water cooled memory modules, the final shipping product is actually quite impressive. We're quite impressed in the way that the modules don't HAVE to be water-cooled in order to get great overclocks - the air cooling system is highly effective in its own right. However, if you add water cooling to the mix, you'll drastically lower your module temperatures and simply have a safer and potentially more stable computing environment when overclocked. We also like that OCZ is offering these modules both at high-end clock speeds and for those who appreciate low latencies without overclocking. However, even these lower-clocked 800MHz modules were able to heavily overclock, as shown by our tests, far further than we were expecting them to. These modules give you a lot of flexibility in if you want to run at ultra low latencies or ultra high clock speeds. Our only major gripes can easily be fixed with a future revision of the cooling system as well. We would like to see OCZ move to larger 3/8 OD diameter water barbs, which are more common in today's water cooling systems. We also would like to see a clamp / security system so users know for certain the tube is in place and secured. Beyond that, the modules did everything we asked them to and well beyond.
|