|
|
| Introduction | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If you have ever been in the market for a graphics card, you are undoubtedly familiar with the constantly changing graphics card market. About every 8-10 months, new GPUs are introduced by NVIDIA and ATI, and after their introduction, dozens of graphics cards built by their add in board partners come to market. Because these add in board partners all use the same graphics chips supplied by the two major graphics card companies, they have to use their marketing savvy to create extra value and incentive for consumers to buy their products.
When we opened the HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro IceQ Turbo’s box we found that the card shipped with a DVI to VGA adapter, an S-Video Cable, HDTV output cable, and an HDMI adapter. The HDMI adapter is a new addition to the Radeon HD 2000 series of graphics cards and allows you to output 5.1 audio and video to a HDMI ready television. Also included in the bundle is the standard user manual and driver disk, along with a paper that gives you access to Half-Life 2: Lost Coast and Half-Life 2: Deathmatch through Valve’s Steam service. |
| The HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro IceQ Turbo 512MB |
|
Upon initial inspection, one of the first things you'll notice is the fact that HIS has kept true to their IceQ Turbo line of cards and added a large, two slot, UV reflective, Arctic Cooling heatsink to their Radeon HD 2600 Pro card. The card uses HIS’ unique teal colored PCB and even has black colored DVI connectors with gold plating. When we take a look at the card's on-board 512MB of GDDR2 memory, we can see that the huge heatsink actually doesn’t cover any of the onboard memory chips, just the card’s GPU. There is no external power source needed with the 2600 series from ATI, the power in the PCIe x16 slot is sufficient for the card to run at maximum performance. It’s important to note that the HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro IceQ Turbo has 512MB of GDDR2 memory, double that of ATI’s reference design.
For comparison, we pictured the reference ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro with 256MB memory with the HIS Radeon X2600 Pro IceQ Turbo that we are testing today. The most obvious difference between the two is of course how small the reference design heatsink is in comparison to the IceQ Turbo heatsink that HIS is using with their card. The Radeon 2600 series run relatively cool by today’s standards, so it might be a little overkill putting on such a large heatsink on the card. It’s also important to note the price difference between the cards. The reference design Radeon HD 2600 Pro with 256MB of memory sells for about $90-$95 while the HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro IceQ Turbo with 512MB of memory is currently priced at around $130. And on another side note, neither the reference nor the HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro cards come with Crossfire connectors. Most of ATI’s add in board partners are choosing to add Crossfire connectors to their Radeon HD 2600 XT cards and not the Radeon HD 2600 Pro. |
| Test System & Overclocking | ||||||||||||
|
To test the HIS Radeon X2600 Pro IceQ Turbo, we set up a new test rig equipped with Intel’s new 1333MHz FSB Core 2 Duo E6750 CPU. We built our system on EVGA’s 680i SLI motherboard and used Corsair’s XMS PC2-8500 DDR2 memory. Since the HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro IceQ Turbo comes factory overclocked and is equipped with a huge Arctic Cooling heatsink fan, we will try to see how high the card can stably overclock and we will compare the card’s performance to that of the reference 256MB ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro ($90-$95) and the reference 256MB NVIDIA GeForce 8600GT ($105-$115). We’re using the latest drivers, Windows Updates, and patches for our games. To do our testing, we turned all our games to high quality and ran 60 second FRAPS sequences three times, averaging the score you see in the tests.
Before we start to talk about our overclocking experience with the card, it’s important to note that the HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro IceQ Turbo is factory overclocked right out of the box. The card ships with a core clock speed of 650MHz, up from the 600MHz reference clock, and with a memory clock speed of 525MHz, up from a reference speed of 500MHz.
|
| Performance Comparisons with Battlefield 2 | ||||||
|
In our Battlefield 2 tests with no AA or AF enabled, we see that the all three cards are able to handle the game well, with the NVIDIA GeForce 8600GT coming out on top at both resolutions. Our overclocked card gave us an extra 3 frames per second in both tests.
When we turned up the quality settings to have 4X AA and 8X AF enabled, we saw the 8600GT once again come out on top, running much faster than even the overclocked Radeon HD 2600 Pro. At 1600x1200 with AA and AF turned on, the 8600GT ran 12 FPS faster than the HIS Radeon HD 2600 IceQ Turbo at stock speeds, and 9 FPS faster than it when it was overclocked. |
| Performance Comparisons with F.E.A.R. | ||||||
|
Our F.E.A.R. tests with no AA or AF enabled show the GeForce 8600GT once again coming out on top of the HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro, this time by an even larger margin.
When we turned on AA and AF, the game became extremely choppy and unplayable on all three cards. However, the 8600GT still maintained a distinct advantage over the overclocked Radeon HD 2600 Pro, running 7 FPS faster at 1280x1024 and 6 FPS faster at 1600x1200. |
| Performance Comparisons with Half-Life 2: Episode 1 | ||||||
|
Our Half-Life 2: Episode 1 tests without AA or AF enabled show the NVIDIA GeForce 8600GT and the overclocked HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro much closer together, but the edge still goes to the 8600GT.
When we turn AA and AF on, the overclocked HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro is virtually tied with the NVIDIA GeForce 8600GT, but at stock speeds, is still significantly slower. |
| Performance Comparisons with Rainbow Six: Vegas | ||||||
|
In the Unreal Tournament 3 powered Rainbow Six: Vegas game, we see more of the same with the reference NVIDIA GeForce 8600GT beating out the Radeon HD 2600 Pro cards by significant margins.
With AA and AF turned on, Rainbow Six: Vegas caused trouble for all of our cards, with the average frame rates of the cards ranging from 22.9-15.6 frames per second. And once again, we see the GeForce 8600GT take the lead and come out on top. |
| Performance Summary & Conclusion | ||||
|
Performance Summary: Overall, the HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro IceQ Turbo 512MB trailed the NVIDIA GeForce 8600GT. In all of the games and at all of the various quality settings and resolutions we tested, the HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro was outpaced by a reference 8600GT, with the card only coming close to the 8600GT while highly overclocked in Half-Life 2.
When we evaluated the Radeon HD 2600 and HD 2400 series of cards back in June, we were impressed with their multimedia features and their reasonable price tags. However, after using the HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro IceQ Turbo 512MB for a few weeks, our impression is less positive. From a performance standpoint, the HIS Radeon HD 2600 Pro IceQ Turbo 512MB lags behind the GeForce 8600GT, even when it is overclocked 90MHz over its stock clock speed, which itself is 50MHz higher than ATI's reference design. We weren’t able to crank up the core clock speed past 740MHz, and suspect that the memory could have overclocked a bit higher as well, if the card’s huge heatsink would have made contact with the memory chips. Also, we saw only a slight performance improvement when going from the 256MB Radeon X2600 Pro to the 512MB HIS version, even though the HIS product already had a 50MHz overclocked core and 25MHz overclocked memory frequency.
Discuss This Article and Share Your Thoughts With Others!
|