Patriot Pyro SE SATA III Solid State Drive Review - HotHardware

Patriot Pyro SE SATA III Solid State Drive Review

28 thumbs up

Our Test Methodologies: Under each test condition, the Solid State Drives tested here were installed as secondary volumes in our testbed, with a standard spinning hard disk for the OS and benchmark installations. Out testbed's motherboard was updated with the latest BIOS available as of press time and AHCI mode was enabled. The SSDs were secure erased and left blank without partitions wherever possible, unless a test required them to be partitioned and formatted, as was the case with our ATTO, PCMark 7, and CrystalDiskMark benchmark tests. Windows firewall, automatic updates and screen savers were all disabled before testing. In all test runs, we rebooted the system and waited for drive activity to settle before invoking a test.

HotHardware Test System
Intel Core i7 and SSD Powered

Processor -

Motherboard -


Video Card -

Memory -

Audio -

Hard Drives -

 

Hardware Used:
Intel Core i7-2600K

Asus P8Z6-V Pro
(Z68 Chipset, AHCI Enabled)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285

4GB Kingston DDR3-1600

Integrated on board

WD Raptor 150GB (OS Drive)
Patriot Pyro SE (120GB)
Patriot Pyro (120GB)
Corsair Force GT (120GB)
Corsair Force 3 (120GB)
Patriot Wildfire (120GB)
Crucial M4 (256)

OS -
Chipset Drivers -
DirectX -

Video Drivers
-


Relevant Software:
Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 x64
Intel 9.2.0.1030, iRST 10.5.1027
DirectX 11

NVIDIA GeForce 275.33

Benchmarks Used:
IOMeter 1.1.0 RC
HD Tune v4.61
ATTO v2.47
AS SSD
CrystalDiskMark v3.01 x64
PCMark 7
SiSoftware Sandra 2011

IOMeter
I/O Subsystem Measurement Tool

As we've noted in previous SSD articles, though IOMeter is clearly a well-respected industry standard drive benchmark, we're not completely comfortable with it for testing SSDs. The fact of the matter is, though our actual results with IOMeter appear to scale properly, it is debatable whether or not certain access patterns, as they are presented to and measured on an SSD, actually provide a valid example of real-world performance for the average end user. That said, we do think IOMeter is a gauge for relative available throughput with a given storage solution. In addition there are certain higher-end workloads you can place on a drive with IOMeter, that you really can't with most other benchmark tools available currently.

In the following tables, we're showing two sets of access patterns; our Workstation pattern, with an 8K transfer size, 80% reads (20% writes) and 80% random (20% sequential) access and IOMeter's default access pattern of 2K transfers, 67% reads (34% writes) and 100% random access.

 

The Patriot Pyro SE was competitive with the other drives when tested with our custom workstation access pattern, but trailed all but the Crucial M4 with IOMeter's default access pattern.

SiSoft SANDRA 2011
Synthetic HDD Benchmarking

Next we ran SiSoft SANDRA, the the System ANalyzer, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant. Here, we used the Physical Disk test suite and provided the results from our comparison SSDs. The benchmarks were run without formatting and read and write performance metrics are detailed below.

The Patriot Pyro SE performed right about where expected in the SiSoft SANDRA Physical Disk benchmark, which is to say it finished right between the more expensive Wildfire and more affordable original Pyro.

Article Index:

+1
+ -

SSD goodness :) Patriot, OCZ, and Corsair have been putting out some crazy drives.

+1
+ -

It's only gonna get better and better in time. I like it,............

Now this is a "Real Cowboy"

(I hereby warn myself for going off topic)

Real Cowboy.jpg

0
+ -

Yea as its getting better and better in time, I will just wait for future ssd :-p

0
+ -

I am really looking to get an SSD and i dont really want to wait for shipping if i cant avoid it.

Best deal with http://www.killeenmax.com

0
+ -

I am new to this SSDs, is it okay to buy the Patriot Pyro? thanks!

Login or Register to Comment
Post a Comment
Username:   Password: