
![]() Image courtesy, Southampton University |
|
This is not "brain-to-brain communication". This is brain-to-LED-to-eye-to-brain-to-sensor-to-screen-back-to-eye-to-brain communication. This experiment replaces your voice with an LED and the other persons ears with their eyes (i.e. It still requires physical senses) - except worse: The recipient doesn't even get the message directly, they have to have a sensor read their visual cortex and send the output to a computer screen for them to re-read. If, like this experiment, we want to discount all human senses and intermediate media used, you could say that talking to someone is a more direct form of brain-to-brain communication. My point is that true brain-to-brain communication shouldn't need sensory input via one of the existing five senses, and should be able to be directly understood without an outside decoder. You could call this brain-to-output_device-to-eye-to-brain transmission. Also, you should be able to use it to scan people until their heads explode. |
|
No thanks on brain-to-brain communications for me. Now, where is my tin-foil hat, and get those kids off my lawn! |
|
Not true brain to brain transmission. Until the second person can decipher the original transmitted thought, all this is doing is using two brains as a very inefficient way of conveying data. |
|
This is an attempt at too much control, except in the case of paraplegic patients. My sister would freak out if she saw this story, (the one who thinks that every computer should be powered by a bicycle and you'd have to pedal fast to surf the web) I think I'll show it to her and watch her turn colors,....... |
|
So if you're running this system and you get the Blue Screen of Death, you...? |
|
witness the birth of skynet :) |