
Nuclear weapons have only been around for a little bit more than half of a century. As such, there is still a lot scientists don't know about how the nuclear weapons and other radioactive materials from nuclear weapons manufacturing degrade over time. Making matters even more complex, to date there still is no permanent storage facility for nuclear waste materials--all current nuclear storage facilities are considered temporary. (Considering that Plutonium has a half-life of 24,100 years, it's difficult to image any storage facility as truly permanent.) Therefore, it is essential that scientists continually monitor nuclear stockpiles, both active and otherwise.|
The statement above in the last paragraph stating "scientists would be left with little choice but to dispose of aging weapons via underground detonations" is not correct. These simulations prevent underground TESTING that would otherwise be done to verify the reliability of the weapons. It has nothing to do with disposal. |
|
"This very lucrative part of SGI feeds high-performance computing (HPC) solutions to the government and military." Did you say lucrative? The last time the word lucrative was associated with SGI was back in 1992. |