
While some breach notification letters do a good job of telling users what happened to their data, a "substantial number" do not, Simitian said, adding that the lack of information leaves consumers "more confused than informed."The bill actually would be an amendment to a state law passed six years ago — the first to force companies to tell their customers when their data was stolen. Simitian co-wrote the original law. Since then, 43 other states have passed similar laws.
Sounds good, but why 500 people...why not even just ONE? If a company has you in their database and allows your info to be stolen then it seems logical to me that there should be some kind of a notification. When companies are held accountable for data breaches, only then will they start to take security seriously! |
|
How did he come up with that number 500? Seems like a typical 'official sounding' number pulled completely out of his ass. So having 499 people's info stolen and their lives turned up side down is all good. |