
|
>> The patent in question here "covers a system to detect telephone numbers in e-mails so, when the number on the screen is tapped, they can be stored in directories or called without dialing." Content-sensitive hyperlinking. It's obvious to anyone practicing in the field, and has a ton of previous art. Therefore the patent is invalid. I literally can't remember a time when there were no programs with this sort of functionality. For example, Sidekick had this same function for phone numbers in 1983 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SideKick). Email programs have been turning addresses into links forever too. >> We understand the value of patents, but this kind of wrist-slapping seems to only be hindering innovation. Here here. +1 Ray. I think that when a patent is found to be such a blatant affront to common sense/practice, the court should fine the suing company for the amount in damages they were seeking. |