Android vs. Windows Phone: The Case For Conversion - HotHardware

Android vs. Windows Phone: The Case For Conversion

21 thumbs up
Despite what the marketshare numbers currently say, Windows Phone 7.5 (Mango) is a force to be reckoned with. If you have any doubts about that, have a look at our Nokia Lumia 900 review. For all intents and purposes, Nokia's push into Windows Phone marks the first real shot that Windows Phone has had at grabbing any significant amount of market share here in America. In fact, Nokia is kind of in that same boat from a hardware perspective. The company may still sell a great deal of phones globally, but its smartphone market share has dwindled significantly in the U.S. It's strange to think of Nokia and Microsoft as "underdogs," but in regards to mobile tech in America, they certainly fit the description.

Moving from Android to Windows Phone has been something of a shock. But a good one, in a lot of ways. Using the Lumia 900 in place of any number of Android phones has made some things easier, some things harder and some new things possible. Windows Phone is such a refreshingly different mobile OS that it's difficult to even compare it to Android in many ways, but with the Lumia 900 being offered for just $99 (or free, in some circumstances) on a new two-year contract, it has surely tempted many consumers. So, without further ado, let's take a look at some of the most compelling reasons to make the switch to Windows Phone...

Beautiful design
Where Android falls a bit short, Windows Phone excels. In fact, I'd argue that Windows Phone 7.5 is the most beautiful mobile OS on the market. There's just nothing out there that looks and feels as smooth and polished in the hand. Microsoft's "Metro" user interface is well crafted on smartphones, and not only is it a solid proving ground for Windows 8 (at least on portable devices), but it's just an efficient (and addictive) way to use a smartphone. Metro's design cues aren't just good looking, they're useful. It's extremely easy to flip and swipe through Windows Phone, and particularly for users who are more interested in ease-of-use than hack-ability, Microsoft has put together a nice package. Also, the live tile feature -- which allows app "tiles" to flip over and present up-to-date, glanceable information -- is a huge leap above the simple notifications available elsewhere.

Nokia support
Nokia is still a huge player in the smartphone space, and still makes some of the best hardware on the market. While not every Windows Phone is a Nokia device, having access to their products is big plus. Nokia's cameras are top-notch, and moreover, those that grab a Lumia will have access to an exclusive niche inside of the Windows Phone app marketplace. In there, you'll get access to Nokia Drive, Transport and Maps. These are the only navigational applications that even come close to rivaling Google Maps Navigation, and in fact, Nokia Drive does Google one better by providing offline map guidance in many countries. Just download the country maps at home, and boom -- offline turn-by-turn guidance on your phone. For travelers, it doesn't get much better.

Social integration

Microsoft's Windows Phone is the only OS on the market that was built from the ground-up to accommodate social media. Yes, Facebook was around when iPhone OS and Android launched, but it wasn't the juggernaut that it is now. The "People" Hub in WP7 is superb. It'll pool updates beautifully from any number of social networks, giving you a quick glance at what the important people in your life are up to. Yes, there are social aggregation tools on Android, but none are as nice and WP's People Hub. And moreover, its baked into the underpinnings of the OS, enabling you to reach it from a variety of other applications.

You've heard the pros, now for the cons…

Limited apps
The sad truth is that the Windows Phone app marketplace is woefully understocked compared to Android's Google Play market. Many of the more popular productivity apps aren't available on Windows Phone, and givin the sub-10 percent market share, it's unlikely many ever will.

Microsoft is not only battling a market share issue -- why would you develop for WP7 when so few people use it? -- but it's also battling an even bigger issue. The WP7 app marketplace is littered with unbecoming applications and general "junk" apps. The filter is seemingly not working. There are hundreds upon hundreds of X-rated apps and apps of terrible quality. All of these culminate in a subpar app experience.

Limited hardware options
Microsoft has very rigid specifications on what a Windows Phone can or can't be. This impacts screen resolution, among other things. From a developing standpoint, these rigid specifications are good; it's tougher to develop for Android simply because there are so many possible screen resolutions to take into account.
The downside for users here, however, is that even the flagship Lumia 900 has a screen with only an 800 x 480 display, and there's no word on when Microsoft will raise the bar to rival some of the 720p+ displays found on Android. It all adds up to phone selection that just can't match the high-powered arsenal of Android-based devices.

Huge disparity versus rival ecosystems
At least on Android, you can generally find most iOS apps, and they work quite well. On iOS, even Google generally tries to make its best applications available for iPhone users. These benefits really don't translate across to Windows Phone. There's no decent Google Voice app for Windows Phone 7, for example, and if you're considering future access to Drive, Maps, etc., you're probably going to be out of luck. Few of the other big players are extending olive branches toward Microsoft's mobile OS, so if it's vitally important to you to have mobile access to Apple or Google-related products, WP will probably fall short of meeting those expectations.

After a few months switching from Google's Android to Microsoft's Windows Phone, we think the switch would be painless and welcome for some, yet impossible perhaps for others. It's hardly a black-and-white issue, though. It all boils down to what kind of user you are. If you're a power user, are into customization, or someone that relies on Google's suite of products on a daily basis, it's going to be difficult to abandon Android. If you're a more casual user that has grown frustrated by some of Android's and its associated device's shortcomings, however, Windows Phone may be an ideal choice.

Windows Phone 7.5 is a great looking mobile OS that makes its competitors looked dated in many respects by comparison, but it's also quite intuitive and easy to enjoy once you've learned your way around. In the end, it's great to have multiple options at our disposal, and hopefully by the year's end, we'll be able to reevaluate the situation once more with Windows Phone 8 and Android 5.0.

Article Index:

+ -

Moving from the open Android ecosystem to Microsoft's buggy, clunky, proprietary and closed WP ecosystem strikes me as a form of masochism; I can't imagine any technically-literate person doing that voluntarily. I own a couple of Android devices, have owned others, and work with Android, Blackberry, and WP devices (and have extensively tested Windows 8, which is arguably WP on desktops). Nothing could convince me to give up Android on my own phone, especially after having suffered with Blackberry and WP.

+ -

Agreed Dan and RT, if you're thinking of WP7 or 7.5 as being a kin to W8 on the desktop, you're way off the mark. WP7.5 is a true handset OS and W8 really only excels for touch devices like tablets and maybe convertible notebooks and touch driven all-in-ones like HP's TouchSmart series for example.

+ -


Buggy and clunky? I can't count how many Android devices have frozen, rebooted, or just shut off in my hands or when someone was trying to do something as simple as showing me a photo they took. How long did it take, and how many cores were added just to get an Android phone to scroll, zoom in and out smoothly? Since owning my Focus S in late 2011, it has froze on me a total of 2 times while using trial apps, never rebooted itself, and never just shut off for no given reason, and always scrolls and works the way it should every day. Not to mention have an Android last 2 days on one charge like a WP7 can. Hell, a friend's LG Android drained his battery to nothing in less than 2 hours because some app decided to keep running in the background. It's fine if you don't like them, but don't make up crap because of it. They work great for people who want a smart phone that acts like the same smart phone every time they unlock it.

+ -

RT, Windows Phone 7.5 just works for the average Joe. Have you experienced WP7 on a handset for any length of time? Many times there are fewer strokes to do various tasks versus Android and the UI is slick and fast. It's not tweakable or as accessible under the hood as Android but it's no joke. It's a solid handset OS.

+ -

I have to agree with Dave on this. I've been using WP 7.5 since November 2011 when the HTC Titan came out for ATT. I have to say, the phone is solid. While most users don't understand how incredible this OS is, as a developer, it's beyond anything that Droid could put out. First, there's so many things that are built right into the search, like, music search, barcode, text scanning, text translating.. Instagram-type app.. Then the FB integration with your contacts.. Instant posting and sharing.. I had a Samsung Captivate. The only things I miss on that phone is swype and Citrix. With my WinPhone, I don't need to have an App Killer. All the apps on the windows phone (this is an OS Feature.. not an app thing) It prevents applications from running in the background. It puts them into hibernation mode. On my samsung, I'd have to go in every few hours to kill apps or my battery would die. Just these few reasons make the phone solid. The only faults I have is that it only works with Unified access gateway servers for VPN (F That btw), and there's no Flash integration. But I can live without it. I have a droid tablet i use for connecting into the office. I'm not a total MS Fanboy, but I gotta give credit where credit is due. The games rock, the video rocks, the Exchange integration is phenominal, and I love the email interface for all my personal email accts.. And the live panels on the front are great.

+ -

"you're considering future access to Drive, Maps, etc., you're probably going to be out of luck" - This may be true but if you go with Nokia then you have Nokia Drive that uses Nokia Maps. This is actually much better than googlemaps as they are more complete ie google maps sometimes misses out entire rural areas just because it has not benefit to there advertising. Nokia Maps have been used by other mapping companies and are extremly good. Plus soon they will be made available as a paid app to other windows phones though why you would go away from Nokia i would not know.

+ -

Mr. Willington,

As a user of Google Apps (gmail, calendar, contacts, docs, etc) would you recommend the Windows Phone? I use google apps constantly. I have an android tablet and phone, but am interested in converting to Windows 7.5 (and Windows 8 on tablets/PC when available), but I am afraid I will lose the functionality with Google that my Android phone give me. It will not be an issue on Win 8 tablets running intel chips/Win 8 Pro, as you can just use chrome or the internet, but it will be on Win 8 arm tablets/Win 8 RT and these phones.

What are your thoughts on this topic?

Login or Register to Comment
Post a Comment
Username:   Password: