


|
What is "A stupid idea"? If the computer doesn't have to read or hear the question like the contestants, it's just not very impressive. They'll no doubt run the board using a small subset of info that would fit into the RAM off a normal PC: all the Presidents and their cabinets with years of office, the names of all European monarchs and their periods, geographic data including the names of all countries, capitals, rivers, the periodic table, etc... Is it that impressive to name the dead poet when you have the collected works of every dead poet sitting on a hard-drive, indexed for instant recall? Infocom was turning english text input into database queries in the 1980s. No doubt IBM will stack the deck (like they did against Kasparov) by keying Watson's indexes to past topics frequently used by the shows writers. Oh yes, there will be questions about Canada. |
|
They could even the playing field a little with some modifications. like the computer can only begin a search once Alex finishes the question.. that would give the humans a chance as a lot of questions get answered before he finishes. |
|
If it's a category the humans are familiar with, they're likely to buzz in as early anyway... That's why you sometimes see them buzz in and have no clue about the answer. Here's the real problem: Say I'm competing and I know the answer as soon as my brain decodes the words from my vision. Watson also knows the answer (and had the benefit of searching his database for longer because it didn't have to convert vision/audio to concept). As soon as the white ring around the board indicates that contestants may buzz in, guess who's going to buzz in first: me, or the guy who's reaction time is measured in nanoseconds? |