Analysts Slash Surface Sales Estimates

We've always known that Microsoft's Surface had an uphill fight ahead of it. Launching a new version of Windows based on an entirely different CPU architecture was a dicey move, as was the decision to push Redmond's own vision for the hardware. In some ways, Microsoft's bets have paid off; the $499 Surface tablet looks and feels like a much more expensive device and the Touch Cover works remarkably well.

Other factors, however, are reportedly dragging sales downwards. Last week, DigiTimes reported that Microsoft had slashed its Surface orders to two million, down from 4M for Q4. Other analysts predicted sales in the two million range. Today, brokerage firm Detwiler Fenton broke ranks, claiming that Microsoft's total Surface sales for Q4 are likely to be well under a million units. Detwiler suggests MS has moved between 500-600,000 units.

That number takes a further hit when you consider that the company already announced that it would gift all 90,000+ of its employees with a Surface. Such units count towards the total number of shipments, but they aren't sales, and they actually hurt the company's bottom line.

Regardless of the final number, it's clear that analysts don't expect Surface to deliver anything like the sales Microsoft was reportedly aiming for. The real question is, why?

Visibility, Price, and Economic Uncertainty

The report from Detwiler suggests that Surface sales have suffered due to the product's low visibility. Units have only been available online via or from the handful of Microsoft retail stores. No Best Buy, no Staples, no shelf presence at Wal-mart or Target translates into lower consumer awareness and weaker sales.

Makes sense so far.

The next factor in play is the unit's price. Here, it's hard to argue. It's already clear that traditional Windows users have very different ideas about what it and isn't desirable in a tablet, and Surface's $100 Touch Cover price tag doesn't help clarify the situation at all. The tablet-only version of the device is $499; a Touch Cover puts it at $599. The problem is that you can buy a pretty decent x86 laptop for that price.

According to iSuppli, the low-end Surface costs Microsoft $284 to manufacture, with the Touch Cover coming in at $14-$18. At $399 for tablet and touch cover, Microsoft would have a killer product. At $499 for both, it would still be an arguably better value than the iPad. At $599, it's a much, much harder product to recommend.

The final problem, that Detwiler Fenton doesn't address, is that the current economic climate in the United States is miserable.

Ever since the election, the focus has been on the so-called "fiscal cliff." The term is a misnomer; the budget cuts that kick in when 12:01 AM January 1 rolls around can be nullified by a further act of Congress. There's no army of federal repo men standing by, no physical consequences that can't be undone. Nevertheless, the date has acquired apocalyptic overtones.

After Congress's irresponsible behavior last year with regard to the debt ceiling, investor confidence that the House will reach an agreement with the President before the end of the 112th Congressional Session is low. Economic reports from both sides of the aisle have indicated that the consequences of failure could send the US back into recession.

It is, in short, a really bad time to be launching a new uncertain device backed by a radically new OS at a high-margin price point. As much as I like Surface's physical design, I'd never recommend anyone buy one right now. The chances of a price cut in the next few months are extremely high, and MS needs to demonstrate that the app ecosystem for Windows RT is going to evolve significantly more than what's currently available.
Via:  Forbes
dorkstar 2 years ago

I've never really considered the "app ecosystem" as a selling point for surface, but I suppose it makes complete sense. Microsoft has a long way to go to catch up to Android or Apple's app store, and a lot of app's are on someone's wish list. I personally thought the Surface was getting a lot more attention then this article says, but what else should I expect, Microsoft has one of the highest recognized brand names in the world, and has spent plenty on advertising the Surface.

RTietjens 2 years ago

Microsoft Surface: Kin, Mark II

codiak 2 years ago

I'm still baffled that MS thought not including a GPS was good business.

CDeeter 2 years ago

"The report from Detwiler suggests that Surface sales have suffered due to the product's low visibility. Units have only been available online via or from the handful of Microsoft retail stores. No Best Buy, no Staples, no shelf presence at Wal-mart or Target translates into lower consumer awareness and weaker sales. "

This plus, the price point hit the nail on the head. You have to be able to go out and buy one in order for sales to follow. And at $399 they would sell.

And with the way MS is advertising Surface all the time, I bet some sales staff are getting frustrated having to say "Sorry we don't have that."

rapid1 2 years ago

They should have made Wally world a US partner in the launch and sold them for 449 or less complete with the touch and there entire inventory would probably be gone. You would think they would notice the Amazon Kindle Fire. The comparison seems relevant to me as the device (especially the RT) has a specific closed garden market place owned by M$ just like the FIRE does at Amazon.


So you sell your device at a low return and make up the difference in software sold through said closed garden, then you not only expand your bottom line you raise awareness of your product, and also the millions of low cost files you sell which the end user pays for the bandwidth to receive it is nothing but a money tree whether it is .50 or $50.00 per unit after development (which much of that is are developed by people who pay to have there product approved and therefore available to your walled garden market) it seems totally imbecilic to me really to over price them as in reality it looses you money as a company.


RTietjens 2 years ago

rapid1 - MS has proven repeatedly that they are incompetent at selling non-Xbox hardware; that's why I mentioned the Kin. They also have the arrogant "We know what you want better than you do" attitude embodied in Jobs's Apple. That's why there there's no GPS in the Surface. Now, granted, I've only used GPS in my Lenovo Android tablet a half-dozen times, but that's 6 times I actually used it - and didn't spend a C-note on a TomTom or Garmin.

There have been some problems with the Xbox (notably with heating), but overall, *that* has been a demonstration of how to sell hardware in a walled garden. Most Xbox owners are enthusiastic, and ready to run out and buy DLC as soon as it's released, too.

Surface is already a flop, and it's likely to drag Windows 8 down with it.

Dorkstar 2 years ago

I think it's too early to call Surface a flop.  We haven't even got to Christmas yet, there are plenty of Microsoft families out there who haven't gotten their Christmas bonus yet

ricofrost 2 years ago

Flop is a bit of a overreaction.

I have both surface and windows 8, love them both. Had no problem with them and they do what i need them too do.

Post a Comment
or Register to comment