by Jennifer Johnson — Monday, June 29, 2009
Olympus E-620 Digital SLR Review
Olympus’ latest E-620 DSLR targets users who are interested in something better than a budget entry-level DSLRs, that don’t want to pay for an upper mid-range or semi-pro body. This new camera is packed with features from the higher-end E-30, but uses a body that’s closer in size to the compact E-420 DSLR. By combining high-end features in a compact body, Olympus addresses many of the complaints users had with the previous E-520 and E-420 models. In essence, The E-620 starts with the E-520’s popular built-in Image Stabilization and combines it with the higher resolution sensor of the E-30 as well as Art Filters and an articulating 2.7-inch screen.
The Olympus E-620 incorporates a Four Thirds lens mount and is compatible with a range of Four Thirds lenses from manufacturers such as Olympus, Sigma, and Panasonic / Leica. These lenses are designed for DSLR use and many offer superb quality. One of the best parts about the Four Thirds system is that it allows manufacturers to make smaller camera bodies. Indeed, the Olympus E-620 is one of the smallest DSLRs we’ve shot with. The camera’s size doesn’t result in a lighter weight, however—in reality, the E-620 weighs about the same as other entry-level DSLRs.
Keep in mind that since the E-620 uses the Four Thirds system, there’s a 2x digital crop factor. This means the equivalent 35mm spec is doubled. Put into numbers, this means the supplied 14-42mm kit lens is actually a 28-84mm lens, and so on. By comparison, Canon’s and Nikon’s APS-C DSLRs have 1.6x and 1.5x multipliers, respectively. Olympus’ 2x crop factor isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it is something wide-angle buffs will want to keep in mind.
At the time of this writing, the E-620 is the smallest body to offer built-in Image Stabilization. What’s great about in-body stabilization is that it works with any lens you attach—new, old, prime, or zoom—so you won’t be paying for this feature with future lens purchases as you would with manufacturers such as Canon or Nikon who build the feature into each lens. The downside with in-body stabilization is that you won’t get to see the stabilizing effect through the viewfinder.
- HotHardware Summer Sweepstakes: Win An...38
- FAA Goes Into Full Panic Mode After...24
- Asus STRIX Radeon R9 390X Review: Hawaii...17
- Microsoft’s Flagship Windows 10 Mobile...13
- Norton Snubs Microsoft Edge Browser Over...12
- Pocket-Sized SCiO Spectrometer Analyzes...9
- Microsoft Allows Windows 10 Home Users...7
- 6 TB Hard Drive Round-Up: WD Red, WD...454k
- Know Your Type: Five Mechanical Gaming...397k
- Dell XPS 13 (2015) Ultrabook Review,...386k
- Intel SSD 750 Series NVMe PCI Express...336k
- Alienware Area-51: Triad, Tri-SLI GTX...208k
- Intel Broadwell NUC NUC5i7RYH With Iris...190k
- HP Spectre X360 Ultrabook Review: Sleek,...189k
Should Rocksteady Be Forgiven For Batman Fiasco?