|
|
| 790i and 750i SLI High Level Overviews |
Below we have a high-level overview of the nForce 790i SLI Ultra chipset's high level architecture and main features. As the illustration shows, the 790i SLI Ultra (and non-Ultra version of the chipset) is a two chip solution consisting of the nForce 790i Ultra SLI SPP in the traditional Northbridge position and the 790i SLI Ultra MCP in the Southbridge position.
The chipset has full support for all Intel desktop processors with front side bus speeds as high as 1600MHz. The DDR3 memory controller in the SPP is compatible with EPP 2.0 and officially capable of speeds up to 2000MHz, although higher speeds are possible with overclocking. 32 of the chipset's PCI Express lanes reside in the SPP, with the remainder coming by way of the MCP. And the two chips are linked via HyperTransport. We should note that the SPP's lanes are gen 2, while the rest are gen 1. What NVIDIA has done here is essentially bring the NF200 chip present on the 780i SLI and 750i SLI chipsets and brought it right onto the SPP.
|
| Feature Spotlight: ESA | ||||
To remedy this situation, the crew at NVIDIA architected a new open standard that has been gaining traction across the industry. ESA, or the Enthusiast System Architecture, as it is known, was designed for real-time monitoring and control of PC power supplies, chassis and water cooling systems. The ESA standard is built around the USB HID (Human Interface Device) specification and has recently been approved by the USB-if HID subcommittee. ESA is essentially a hardware and software based interface that takes data collected by analog sensors and converts it to digital information that can accessed via software. Below are a handful of slides that explain some of the inner workings of ESA.
The question remains, how would ESA compliant hardware affect you as an enthusiast? As an example, let's consider a case. An ESA compliant case could have a number of thermal sensors throughout its interior with their positions throughout the enclosure recorded in ROM. The fans used in the case are also connected to an ESA compliant controller. Should one of the thermal sensors in the case read a high temperature, the ESA microcontroller can instruct the necessary case fans to spin up, which will reduce the temperature. Cooling devices can also gain new functionality like real-time monitoring of water temperatures and flow-rates and controlled fans and pumps. And the data collected can be viewed through software or even by glancing down at LEDs that can be programmed to change colors in different scenarios. When ESA was first announced, NVIDIA named a number of high-profile partners the company claimed were backing the ESA standard, like Asus, Dell, CoolIT, Cooler Master, Gigabyte, MSI, Thermaltake, among others. Since that initial announcement, we've seen a number of products at events like CES that were ESA compliant. And for this launch, NVIDIA showed off another group of products that take advantage of ESA. We've got Silverstone's TJ10 ESA eidtion case pictured above, as well as Thermaltake's Big Water 780e liquid-cooling system, and a Top Power PSU too. Although it wasn't clear that ESA would take off when the standard was unveiled, it appears now that more and more manufacturers are jumping on board. |
| EPP 2.0, Broadcast and PW Short | ||||||||
Like the nForce 680i and 780i SLI that came before it, the new nForce 790i SLI Ultra has support for Enhanced Performance Profiles, or EPP. EPP is a feature designed to maximize system performance by automatically tweaking memory and CPU frequencies, multipliers and voltages. The different with the nForce 790i SLI Ultra though, is that EPP - now up to revision 2.0 - supports DDR3 memory.
For example, if the EPP 2.0 data stored in the SPD states a particular memory kit is capable of running at 1800MHz with 7-7-7-20 timings at 2.0v, EPP 2.0 will automatically alter the processor's multiplier, the voltage and bus speed, along with the memory voltage, to get as close to the memory's rated speed as possible. EPP 2.0 can also be configured to overclock the processor by a user determined percentage to hit the memory's rated speed.
When we covered the nForce 780i SLI launch a few months back, we talked about the NF200 chip that brought the chipset's support for PCI Express 2.0. With the nForce 790i SLI, however, the NF200 has essentially been integrated into the MCP. Along with its PCI Express 2.0 interface, NVIDIA has also disclosed details regarding patented technology that we'll talk about here. Essentially, what NVIDIA has done is build-in a couple of fast paths inside the switch device, dedicated to optimizing mulit-GPU SLI transaction performance both back to the root CPU complex and peer-to-peer between GPUs
Specifically, there are two functional blocks as you'll note in the above diagrams, denoted as "Broadcast" and "PWShort". The Broadcast block provides a broadcast send mode for the root complex down to all GPUs in the system. This allows efficient transfer of data in one group transaction. PWShort, (which stands for Posted Write Short), is a dedicated cut-through mode for peer-to-peer communications between the GPUs, without the need to tap on upstream bandwidth to the CPU complex. What this means is that given the right workload, Broadcast and PWShort allow for faster data transfers too and from the GPUs. |
| Motherboards from ASUS and EVGA |
In preparation for today's launch, we got our hands on a pair of nForce 790i SLI Ultra-based motherboards, one from EVGA and another from ASUS. As has been the case for the last few chipset releases, NVIDIA has set forth a reference motherboard that a few of their partners will be releasing. The EVGA nForce 790i SLI Ultra pictured here is based on NVIDIA's reference design.
Like previous high-end nForce chipsets, the nForce 790i SLI includes a removable fan that can be easily snapped into place without the need for tools or screws. The exhaust direction of the removable fan is also optimized for better overall system cooling. Along with a well designed cooling apparatus, the reference nForce 790i SLI Ultra motherboard design also has a number of extra ports and headers, including coaxial and optical audio connectors, an eSATA connector in the rear I/O backplane, an integrated LED POST code display, and on-board power and reset switches.
|
| BIOS Options and Overclocking | ||||||||
EVGA's nForce 780i SLI Ultra motherboard, and all other reference motherboards based on the chipset for that matter, are outfitted with a Phoenix/Award BIOS designed by NVIDIA, dubbed nvBIOS. As you'd probably expect, the BIOS is very complete and easy to navigate. From within it menus users have the ability to configure, enable or disable all of the board's integrated peripherals, and monitor voltages and clock speeds. The nForce 780i SLI Ultra also has a complete set of memory timing options that offer great flexibility for fine tuning memory performance. The standard BIOS menu screens are somewhat ordinary, but they will give you a good feel for the layout and organization of the options, which is very good in our opinion. Each individual screen has a host of menus that tunnel deeper and deeper as the options get more complex. Overall, it is very similar to the Award BIOS derivatives used on most other motherboards, but navigating through nvBIOS is a bit more intuitive than most.
The BIOS also gives users the ability to save profiles with different settings, which makes it easy to switch from overclocked mode, to silent mode, for example. And it's got a built in memory test too, which is handy for testing the stability of an overclocked system. All of the board's overclocking related options can be found under the Advanced Chipset menu. The section is broken down into multiple sub-menus ( System Clocks, FSB & Memory Config, CPU Configuration, and System Voltages). And each section is home to the tools necessary to tweak that particular aspect of the system. From within the nvBIOS, users have the ability to alter CPU and HT multipliers, PCI Express, Front Side Bus, and Memory frequencies, and a number of different voltages. CPU voltages as high as 2.0v are available and the memory voltage can be set as high as 2.275v. All frequency and voltage settings have fine granularity and handy "current value" list that shows what each option is configured to at that point in time. Like the nForce 680i and 780i, one of the more useful options allows users to run the memory in Linked or Unlinked mode. When linked, the memory clock is affected when the FSB is altered, like most other enthusiast class motherboards. But in Unlinked mode, users can actually key in a memory frequency independent of the FSB. Unlinked mode works hand in hand with EPP 2.0. Using the Crucial memory kit we showed you on a previous page, we were able to run the RAM at 2.0GHz, without affecting the FSB using EPP 2.0 and unlinked mode.
The ASUS Striker II Extreme also has a well appointed BIOS. From within its BIOS users also have the ability to configure, enable or disable all of the board's integrated peripherals, and monitor voltages and clock speeds. The Striker II Extreme has a very complete set of memory timing options as well. The Striker II Extreme 's standard BIOS menu screens look much like any other enthusiast ASUS motherboard; the images here will give you a feel for the general layout and organization of the options. Overall, other than the color scheme, they are very similar to the BIOS derivatives used on most other high-end motherboards today. The options are also quite similar to the nvBIOS, although there are organized very differently. It's within the "Extreme Tweaker" section of the Striker II Extreme 's BIOS that you'll find most of the board's performance tuning options. From within the "Extreme Tweaker" section of the BIOS, users have the ability to alter clock frequencies and voltages for virtually every major on-board component. The CPU and PCI Express frequencies can be altered in 1MHz increments, and the CPU multiplier and memory ratio can also be manipulated manually. There are also extensive voltage options for the CPU, Memory, chipset, and PLL along with 12 other voltage related options.
Naturally, with all of the emphasis put on the overclockability of the nForce 790i SLI Ultra, we had to give it a shot for ourselves. Using the EVGA nForce 790i Ultra motherboard, we set out to see how high we could take the FSB before our test system became unstable. There are some notes regarding the nForce 790i SLi Ultra's overclockability that we should pass on to your first though. NVIDIA invested a lot of time into finding optimal voltages for stable overclocking and recommends leaving many BIOS options on AUTO for all but the most hardcore overclocking. The memory configuration is also important. For DDR3 speeds up to 1800MHz, any memory slot can be used. But for speeds in excess of 1800MHz, NVIDIA recommends DIMMs be installed in the second pair of memory slots, in what they call an 0101 configuration. For our tests, we installed some Crucial DDR3 RAM rated for 2.0GHz in a 0101 configuration and cranked up the CPU voltage to 1.4v and the memory voltage to 2.0v. The rest of the motherboard's performance related options were left on AUTO. We then increased the FSB until the system was no longer stable. In this configuration, we were actually able to boot into Windows with the FSB and memory clocks at 2GHz (500MHz FSB), but our system wasn't completely stable. We had to back the FSB down to 493MHz. That is an impressive number considering the minimal amount of tweaking we had to do in the BIOS and that the memory was running in linked mode. With more extensive tweaking and fine tuning of the memory speeds, we're sure higher FSB speeds are possible as well. |
| Enter the GeForce 9800 GX2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As we mentioned earlier, the second new addition to NVIDIA's ultimate gaming platform is the GeForce 9800 GX2. Although this is the first product to be released in the GeForce 9800 series, it is not based on a brand new GPU. The GeForce 9800 GX2 is built around NVIDIA's proven G92 GPU, that first debuted on the GeForce 8800 GT. On the GeForce 9800 GX2, however, all of the GPU's stream processors (128) are exposed, just like on the GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB. With two GPUs powering the board, that means it has a total 256 stream processors at its disposal, in addition to 1GB of DDR3 memory - 512MB per GPU.
The main features and specifications for the GeForce 9800 GX2 are listed above. As you can see, the GPU is built using a 65nm fabrication process. On stock GeForce 9800 GX2 cards, the GPUs are clocked at 600MHz, with a 1.5GHz shader clock, and 1GHz memory. If you recall, the GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB's GPU is clocked at 670MHz with 900MHz memory, so a pair of GTS cards running in SLI mode will offer higher shader performance and fillrate, but less memory bandwidth. Keep that in mind as you look through the benchmark results that appear a little later in this article. The GeForce 9800 GX2 offers a total of 128GB/s of memory bandwidth, with a 1GB frame buffer (512MB per GPU), 32 ROPs (16 per GPU), and 128 Texture Filtering Units (64 per GPU), for a total of 76.8GigaTexels/sec. Not listed here are some new PureVideo HD related features that have been exposed in the G9x series of GPUs. In addition to all of the previous PureVideo HD related features available on other GeForce graphics cards, the 9800 GX2 has support for Dynamic Contrast Enhancement, Dynamic Color Enhancement, and Dual-Stream Decode. If you've ever corrected a digital photo's color and contrast in a program like Photoshop, you'll be familiar with how the Dynamic Color and Contrast Enhancements work. Each frame in a digital video is "corrected" to adjust for poor quality recording or mastering. And the Dual-Stream Decode allows the GeForce 9800 GX2 to accelerate two video streams simultaneously, which helps reduce CPU utilization when playing back Blu-Ray or HD DVD disks that have PiP functionality. |
| A Closer Look at the 9800 GX2 |
The GeForce 9800 GX2 card is a real departure from previous NVIDIA designs. In some respects, the GeForce 9800 GX2 is like the 7950 GX2 in that they both utilize a pair of PCBs linked together on a single graphics adapter. The GeForce 9800 GX2, however, has a more innovative design in our opinion. We think you'll agree after you see the goods...
The GeForce 9800 GX2 features a pair of dual-link DVI-I outputs in addition to an HDMI output, that also carries audio signals. To one side of the GX2's 6-pin PCI Express power connectors, there is a tiny S/PDIF input header. GeForce 9800 GX2 cards will include a cable that connects a motherboard's S/PDIF output to this header, where it is then channeled to the HDMI output. And while the GX2 has a dual DVI outputs, multi-display functionality still operates like two cards - multi-GPU performance SLI mode must be disabled for a multi-monitor setup. We should note, however, NVIDIA plans to change this with a future driver release.
With the GeForce 9800 GX2's external shell removed, you can get a better view of the card's innards. Along the bottom, a ribbon cable connection the two PCBs together is visible, as are the vents in the PCBs and the large cooler. We're sure some debate will ensure as to whose dual-GPU design is more elegant, NVIDIA's or ATI's, but what does that mean really? It's the all around performance that counts.
|
| Our Test Systems and SANDRA | |||||||||||||
HOW WE CONFIGURED THE TEST SYSTEMS: We have two sets of benchmark tests to discuss in this article. The first round of tests consist of five different motherboards compared using identical supporting hardware. In addition to the motherboard tests, we also tested all of the graphics cards used in this article on either an Asus nForce 790i SLI Ultra based Striker II Extreme motherboard (NVIDIA GPUs) or an Asus P5E3 Premium (ATI GPUs) powered by a Core 2 Extreme QX6850 quad-core processor and 2GB of low-latency Corsair RAM. The first thing we did when configuring these test systems was enter their respective BIOSes and set all values to their "optimized" or "high performance" default settings. Then we manually configured the memory timings and disabled any integrated peripherals that wouldn't be put to use. The hard drive was then formatted, and Windows Vista Ultimate was installed. When the installation was complete we fully updated the OS, and installed the latest DX10 redist and various hotfixes, along with the necessary drivers and applications.
We began our testing with SiSoftware's SANDRA XII, the System ANalyzer, Diagnostic and Reporting Assistant. We ran three of the built-in subsystem tests that partially comprise the SANDRA XII suite on the nForce 790i SLI Ultra-based system (CPU Arithmetic, Memory, and Memory Latency). All of the scores reported below were taken with the processor running at its default clock speed of 3.0GHz with DDR3-1333MHz RAM, operating in Linked mode.
The nForce 790i SLI Ultra performed as we expected in the SANDRA CPU arithmetic benchmark, where it was in-line with other platforms we have tested and the reference systems in SANDRA's database. The Memory Bandwidth and Latency benchmarks, however, tell a more interesting story. The nForce 790i SLI Ultra's peak bandwidth as reported by SANDRA is right on par, albiet slightly higher, than Intel's X38 / X48 chipset. And the nForce 790i SLI Ultra's latency score is significantly lower than Intel's chipset as well (62ns vs. 71ns). If these synthetic metrics hold true in real-world testing, the nForce 790i SLI should perform quite well in comparison to Intel's current offerings. |
| 790i SLI Ultra: PCMark Vantage | ||||
We ran a handful of NVIDIA and Intel-based platforms, including the new nForce 790i SLI Ultra, through Futuremark’s latest system performance metric built especially for Windows Vista, PCMark Vantage. PCMark Vantage runs through a host of different usage scenarios to simulate different types of workload including High Definition TV and movie playback and manipulation, gaming, image editing and manipulation, music compression, communications, and productivity. Most of the tests are multi-threaded as well, so the tests can exploit the additional resources offered by a quad-core CPU.
Looking at the individual PCMark Vantage benchmark results, its clear that the nForce 790i SLI Ultra is a high-performing chipset. In all but one test (Communications), the new nForce- 790i SLI Ultra based motherboard from EVGA and ASUS performed at, or near, the head of the pack. The gaming, memories, an productivity tests in particular paint the nForce 790i SLI Ultra in a very positive light. So far, those bandwidth and latency advantages seem to be paying dividends. |
| 790i SLI Ultra: LAME MT, Sony Vegas | ||||||||
In our custom LAME MT MP3 encoding test, we convert a large WAV file to the MP3 format, which is a popular scenario that many end users work with on a day-to-day basis to provide portability and storage of their digital audio content. LAME is an open-source mid to high bit-rate and VBR (variable bit rate) MP3 audio encoder that is used widely around the world in a multitude of third party applications.
In this test, we created our own 223MB WAV file (a hallucinogenically-induced Grateful Dead jam) and converted it to the MP3 format using the multi-thread capable LAME MT application in single and multi-thread modes. Processing times are recorded below, listed in seconds. Once again, shorter times equate to better performance.
Talk about a dead heat. Our custom LAME MT benchmark performed exactly the same on all of the platforms we tested. This test is completely CPU bound, hence the similarities in performance between the different chipsets.
Sony's Vegas DV editing software is heavily multi-threaded as it processes and mixes both audio and video streams. This is a new breed of digital video editing software that takes full advantage of current dual and multi-core processor architectures. The nForce 790i SLI Ultra based motherboards performed very well in our Sony Vegas benchmark, trailing Intel's X48 chipset by only a second or two, but surpassing the nForce 680i SLI and 780i SLI by one to six seconds. |
| 790i SLI Ultra: POV Ray, Kribibench | ||||||||
POV-Ray, or the Persistence of Vision Ray-Tracer, is an open source tool for creating realistically lit 3D graphics artwork. We tested with POV-Ray's standard included benchmarking model on all of our test machines and recorded the scores reported for each. We should also note that we used the latest 64-bit beta build of the program. Results are measured in pixels-per-second throughput.
We had another very tight grouping in the multi-threaded POV-Ray benchmark. It wouldn't be prudent to declare any one platform faster than another here, but the nForce 790i SLI Ultra does perform well, once again finishing just behind Intel's offering, but ahead of the previous nForces.
For this next batch of tests, we ran Kribibench v1.1, a 3D rendering benchmark produced by the folks at Adept Development. Kribibench is an SSE aware software renderer where a 3D model is rendered and animated by the host CPU and the average frame rate is reported. We used two of the included models with this benchmark: a "Sponge Explode" model consisting of over 19.2 million polygons and the test suite's "Ultra" model that is comprised of over 16 billion polys. As you can see, we had a problem getting Kribibench to perform well on the nForce 780i SLI and 680i SLI, but it had no problem on the nForce 790i SLI Ultra. In fact, the new ASUS and EVGA nForce 790i SLI Ultra motherboard performed at the head of the pack with the Sponge Explode model. Although, the X48 squeaked out another close one with the Ultra model. |
| 790i SLI Ultra: Cinebench, 3DMark06 CPU | ||||||||
Cinebench R10 is an OpenGL 3D rendering performance test based on Cinema 4D. Cinema 4D from Maxon is a 3D rendering and animation tool suite used by 3D animation houses and producers like Sony Animation and many others. It's very demanding of system processor resources and is an excellent gauge of pure computational throughput.
This is a multi-threaded, multi-processor aware benchmark that renders a single 3D scene and tracks the length of the entire process. The time it took each test system to render the entire scene is represented in the graph below, listed in seconds.
We had another virtual dead heat in the Cinebench R10 benchmark. All of the platforms performed within a fraction of a percentage point here, although the new nForce 790i SLI Ultras did trail the others every so slightly in the multi-threaded test.
3DMark06's built-in CPU test is a multi-threaded DirectX gaming metric that's useful for comparing relative performance between similarly equipped systems. This test consists of two different 3D scenes that are processed with a software renderer that is dependent on the host CPU's performance. Calculations that are normally reserved for your 3D accelerator are instead sent to the CPU for processing and rendering. The frame-rate generated in each test is used to determine the final score.
It was another close on the 3DMark06 CPU benchmark. In this test, the Intel X48 system put up the highest score, followed closely behind by the nForce 790i SLi Ultra, and the remaining nForce chipsets. |
| 790i SLI Ultra: Gaming Tests | ||||
For our next set of tests, we moved on to some in-game benchmarking with Crysis and Enemy Territory: Quake Wars. When testing processors with Crysis or ET:QW, we drop the resolution to 800x600, and reduce all of the in-game graphical options to their minimum values to isolate CPU and memory performance as much as possible. However, the in-game effects, which control the level of detail for the games' physics engines and particle systems, are left at their maximum values, since these actually do place some load on the CPU rather than GPU.
The nForce 790i SLI Ultra-based EVGA and ASUS motherboard outperformed every other platform in the low-resolution Crysis CPU benchmark. They didn't fare quite as well in the Enemy Territory benchmark, but their performance was still very good. In the low-resolution ETQW test, the X48 put up a slightly higher framerate, but the 790i SLI Ultras did finish ahead of the older nForce chipsets. |
| GeForce 9800 GX2: 3DMark06 | ||||||
Over the next few pages, we'll focus our attention on the new GeForce 9800 GX2. For our GPU benchmarks, we tested the GeForce 9800 GX2, and all of the other GeForces for that matter, on the ASUS Striker II Extreme. The ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2, however, was tested on the X48-based ASUS P5E3 Premium.
According to 3DMark06's overall score, the GeForce 9800 GX2 performs just below the Radeon HD 3870 X2, but well ahead of any single-GPU setup. Of course, 3DMark06 performance doesn't always translate into higher performance in actual though, so we'll see how the card does in the real-world a little later.
If we tunnel into the overall 3DMark06 results, we see how each card performed in the individual Shader Model tests. As you can see, in the SM 2.0 tests, the Radeon had a marked advantage that dwindles away in the more taxing SM 3.0 and HDR tests. |
| GeForce 9800 GX2: HL2 Episode 2 | ||||||
So much for those 3DMark06 results, huh? In our custom Half Life 2: Episode 2 benchmark, the new GeForce 9800 GX2 significantly outperforms any other single-card solution. The dual-card GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB SLI configuration does pull ahead due to its higher GPU core and memory clock speeds, but the difference in minscule. |
| GeForce 9800 GX2: Unreal Tournament 3 | ||||||
The Radeon HD 3870 X2 puts up a good fight with UT3 running at 1920x1200, but the GeForce 9800 GX2 pulled away once the resolution was increased to 2560x1600. At the higher resolution, the GeForce 9800 GX2 was over 10 FPS faster than the 3870 X2, and nearly twice as fast as any of the single-GPU powered cards. |
| GeForce 9800 GX2: ET Quake Wars | ||||||
The new GeForce 9800 GX2 continued its beat-down of all the other graphics cards in our custom Enemy Territory Quake Wars benchmark. The dual-card GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB SLI configuration was slightly faster, but none of the other cards - including the dual-GPU powered Radeon HD 3870 X2 - could touch the GeForce 9800 GX2 here. |
| GeForce 9800 GX2: Crysis | ||||||
With Crysis running at 1920x1200, the GeForce 9800 GX2 simply crushes the competition, with the exception of the GTS SLI setup. At 2560x1600, however, the scaling isn't quite as dramatic. We should note that we had an issue with the Radeon HD 3870 X2 at the higher resolution and have omitted its results. |
| GeForce 9800 GX2: Video Performance | ||||
We also did some quick testing of the GeForce 9800 GX2's video processing engine, in terms of both image quality and CPU utilization with some HQV and H.264 playback tests.
HQV is comprised of a sampling of SD video clips and test patterns that have been specifically designed to evaluate a variety of interlaced video signal processing tasks, including decoding, de-interlacing, motion correction, noise reduction, film cadence detection, and detail enhancement. As each clip is played, the viewer is required to "score" the image based on a predetermined set of criteria. The numbers listed below are the sum of the scores for each section. We played the HQV DVD using the latest version of Cyberlink's PowerDVD HD, with hardware acceleration for AMD AVIVO HD and NVIDIA PureVideo HD extensions enabled.
Next we conducted a test using an H.264 encoded movie trailer clip for "Beowulf" which is available for download on Apple's QuickTime HD website. The CPU utilization data gathered during these tests was taken from Windows Vista's built-in Performance Monitor. The graphs show the CPU utilization for a GeForce 9800 GX2 and a Radeon HD 3870 X2 using PowerDVD HD to playback the QuickTime clip.
|
| Power Consumption and Noise | ||||
|
Before we bring this article to a close, we'd like to cover a few final data points. Throughout all of our benchmarking and testing, we monitored how much power our test systems were consuming using a power meter. Our goal was to give you all an idea as to how much power each configuration used while idling and under a heavy workload. Please keep in mind that we were testing total system power consumption at the outlet here, not just the power being drawn by the motherboards alone.
This first graph shows the power consumption of each motherboard, when outfitted with identical supporting hardware (Core 2 Extreme QX6850, 2GB RAM, GeForce 8800 GTX). The nForce 790i SLI Ultra based motherboard consumed the most power here, especially under load where the ASUS Striker II Extreme used more power than even the 3-chip nForce 780i SLI.
This next graph represent the total system power consumption with the different graphics cards installed. While idling, the Radeon HD 3870 X2-powered system consumed the least amount of power, but under load the Radeon shot up to near the head of the pack; only the GeForce 8800 GTS 512MB SLI configuration consumed more. If you focus our attention on the GeForce 9800 GX2 specifically, you'll see that despite being powered by two GPUs and 1GB of RAM, the GX2 consumes only slightly more power than the GTX. |
| Our Summary and Conclusion | ||
Performance Summary: We'll need to discuss the individual performance of two products here, the nForce 790i SLI Ultra chipset and the GeForce 9800 GX2 graphics card; so we'll break down this summary into two sections.
|