<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hothardware.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tag 'WWDC 2012'</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/search/SearchResults.aspx?s=61&amp;o=DateDescending&amp;tag=WWDC+2012&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tag 'WWDC 2012'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>RE: New MacBook Air Models are Faster, Cheaper, and Even Bigger Threat to Ultrabooks</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/61712/430285.aspx#430285</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:02:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:430285</guid><dc:creator>mhenriday</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;If these products are as good as they are represented to be, why does Apple insist on attempting to block other makers by means of patently absurd patents (see Super Dave&amp;#39;s post above) and high-profile court cases, with the inevitable fallout of massive ill will ? Perhaps the company feels it can continue to count on the unquestioning loyalty of the fanbois (and girls), but hopefully this calculation will prove to be erroneous. By all means, compete on technical and design quality and innovation, but not on lawyers and legal suits !...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Henri&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>