<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hothardware.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'USA' and 'smartphone cases'</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/search/SearchResults.aspx?s=46&amp;o=DateDescending&amp;tag=USA,smartphone+cases&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'USA' and 'smartphone cases'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>RE: OtterBox Tries To Get Chinese Phone Cases Banned</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/55576/397694.aspx#397694</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:08:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:397694</guid><dc:creator>mhenriday</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Absurd ! Is the shape or the colour that OtterBox is claiming proprietary rights to ? Form and colour are both part of our intellectual commons - to say that a certain company has an exclusive right to such elements is no more than an unconscionable land grab. If OtterBox wants to sell more hard-case covers, then perhaps they should look to the quality of their products and their pricing, compared to competitors. They should not be allowed monopoly rights to our commons - even if they are based in the USA ! The only thing that lawsuits of this type further is lawyers&amp;#39; incomes....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Henri&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>