<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hothardware.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'lcd', '27-inch', and 'Dell'</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/search/SearchResults.aspx?s=17&amp;o=DateDescending&amp;tag=lcd,27-inch,Dell&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'lcd', '27-inch', and 'Dell'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>RE: 30-inches of Precision: A Look at Dell's UltraSharp U3011 30-inch Monitor</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/61289/428714.aspx#428714</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:50:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:428714</guid><dc:creator>mhenriday</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I really like that 16:10 form factor, with which I am familiar from my current 24&amp;quot; HP LP2465, but the problem is that the Dell costs about 2/3 as much again as the 27&amp;quot; 16:9 Samsung SyncMaster models with PLS panels, S27A850T and S27A850D, respectively, that I&amp;#39;ve been eying. And while a larger screen would be nice, the 27&amp;quot; models do provide a sharper image, due to lesser pixel size at max resolution, and I have a sneaking suspicion that the quality of the Samsung models is superior. O well, while waiting for a solution to this problem of what to choose to turn up, I save money, which is probably a good thing as were I to purchase any one of these three models, I&amp;#39;d also have to upgrade from my ancient Geforce 7900 GTX to something significantly more powerful in order to run them....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Henri&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>