<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hothardware.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tags 'laptop' and 'AMD Trinity'</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/search/SearchResults.aspx?o=DateDescending&amp;tag=laptop,AMD+Trinity&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tags 'laptop' and 'AMD Trinity'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>RE: Samsung Series 5 Notebooks Receive AMD Trinity Treatment</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/61784/430740.aspx#430740</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:48:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:430740</guid><dc:creator>mhenriday</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;laquo;&lt;span style="font-size:small;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-family:comic sans ms,sans-serif;"&gt;I can moderate user posts, but not correct the articles, I think an Admin is required for that.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;raquo; I have no problem with that, realneil, but perhaps you could send a note upstairs ? Correcting errors (even if they are not the fault of the author, as in this case), goes a long way to preserving credibility....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Henri&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Samsung Series 5 Notebooks Receive AMD Trinity Treatment</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/61784/430702.aspx#430702</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 11:02:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:430702</guid><dc:creator>mhenriday</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, &lt;b&gt;realneil&lt;/b&gt; - good that you chaps (and ladies, in the event) are keeping an eye out for this sort of thing ! One minor point - the cut -and-paste was not from any of my posts, but rather from &lt;b&gt;NotRappaport&lt;/b&gt;&amp;#39;s first post. With respect to the question of contradictory messages from Samsung - as per &lt;b&gt;NotRappaport&lt;/b&gt;&amp;#39;s link and that provided in my reply above - when I now access the latter, I find that it has been corrected and&amp;nbsp; the A6-4455M found on the Series 5 535 13.3&amp;rdquo; Notebook is indeed confirmed to be a dual-core processor. Thus, like &lt;b&gt;NotRappaport&lt;/b&gt;, I submit that the first period in the second paragraph of the above article, which begins &amp;laquo;The &lt;a href="http://www.samsung.com/us/computer/laptops/NP535U3C-A01US" target="_blank"&gt;Samsung Series 5 535 13.3-inch&lt;/a&gt; (1366x768 resolution) laptop sports an AMD quad-core A6-4455M APU clocked at 2.1GHz ...&amp;raquo; should be corrected to reflect this fact....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Henri&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Samsung Series 5 Notebooks Receive AMD Trinity Treatment</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/61784/430609.aspx#430609</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:39:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:430609</guid><dc:creator>mhenriday</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Wuchengt, I did indeed see the chart - but as I pointed out above, the fault is not that of the article author, but of Samsung, for releasing contradictory information....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Henri&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Samsung Series 5 Notebooks Receive AMD Trinity Treatment</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/61784/430550.aspx#430550</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:43:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:430550</guid><dc:creator>mhenriday</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;NotRappaport&lt;/b&gt;, the fault - if, indeed, it is a fault - is not that of &lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;HH&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, but rather that of Samsung, as can be seen from the specs the firm itself is announcing for the Series 5 535 13.3&amp;rdquo; Notebook (http://www.samsung.com/us/computer/laptops/NP535U3C-A01US-specs)....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Henri&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Samsung Series 5 Notebooks Receive AMD Trinity Treatment</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/61784/430513.aspx#430513</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:59:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:430513</guid><dc:creator>mhenriday</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Paul, how about a head-to-head between the 14&amp;quot; Ivy Bridge sporting a Core i5 3210M and the Series 5 535 with an A 10-4655M APU described above ? I find the TN panels with 1366 x 768 resolution on these notebooks disappointing, especially coming from a leader in screen innovation like Samsung, but hopefully in the near future, manufacturers will deem it worth their while to provide users with better screens....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Henri&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>