<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hothardware.com/cs/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Search results matching tag 'memory'</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/search/SearchResults.aspx?a=0&amp;o=DateDescending&amp;tag=memory&amp;orTags=0</link><description>Search results matching tag 'memory'</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>Re: DDR3 Round-Up: Memory Performance With The Core</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/42063/326094.aspx#326094</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:31:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:326094</guid><dc:creator>ZForgetAboutIt</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t understand how (in Article Index: Clock Speed&amp;quot;) the Crysis benchmark graph shows&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp; 1866 MHz = 73.76 FPS&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 800 MHz = 66.36 FPS&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;difference =&amp;nbsp; 7.40 FPS&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but the article text in that section claims&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left:30px;"&gt;&amp;quot;Moving from DDR3-800 to DDR3-1866 bumped up Crysis by nearly &lt;b&gt;10 FPS&lt;/b&gt;...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please explain.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Question on RAM cooler</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/40468/317288.aspx#317288</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 10:03:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:317288</guid><dc:creator>Paul Olivenza Jr</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I have been searching for articles regarding&amp;nbsp;RAM coolers that would work well (without issues)&amp;nbsp;with the Dorminator series . . . the only water block I can find is the Thermaltake Aqua RX R-1 and the coolance RAM 35 . . . (the coolance RAM will only fit if the heat spreader or heat sink can be removed) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anybody with experience on this? Any advice?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;. . . much appreciated. &lt;img src="http://hothardware.com/cs/emoticons/emotion-21.gif" alt="Yes" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>XP recognizes only 2 gb</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/38905/307210.aspx#307210</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 08:27:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:307210</guid><dc:creator>BudJ</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m new here so please bear with me. I&amp;#39;ve just built a new SLI computer. I put in 2 OCZ 2 gb sticks. The bios registers 4 gb but windows only see 2. I knew it wouldn&amp;#39;t see all four but two seems pretty low. I have two 512 mb graphics cards so that accounts for 1 gb of memory not being accessible, but what would cause the other gb to be lost? Is there anything I can do to recover some of that last one?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Upgrading / Pairing memory</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/37927/300695.aspx#300695</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:59:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:300695</guid><dc:creator>Dev</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;There is no need for 3 GB with that system. 2 GB should be more than enough for games. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-Dev &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: DDR3 2GHz</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/37042/293590.aspx#293590</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:35:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:293590</guid><dc:creator>Dave_HH</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You all saw this story on HH yesterday, right?&amp;nbsp; &lt;img src="http://hothardware.com/cs2007/emoticons/emotion-2.gif" alt="Big Smile" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/Corsair_Dominator_TWIN3X20481800C7DFIN/"&gt;http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/Corsair_Dominator_TWIN3X20481800C7DFIN/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Not too shabby!&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Wat Causes CPU Spikes?!?!</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/35602/288864.aspx#288864</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:08:56 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:288864</guid><dc:creator>NinjaRalphpuy</dc:creator><description>wat anti virus u think i should use?&lt;br /&gt;</description></item><item><title>Wat Causes CPU Spikes?!?!</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/35602/288823.aspx#288823</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 03:07:58 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:288823</guid><dc:creator>NinjaRalphpuy</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;My computer running slow, when I open tasks manager the CPU usage was
off the charts! I thought it was Virus so i scanned wit Avast and no
virus was found!&lt;img src="http://hothardware.com/cs2007/emoticons/emotion-12.gif" alt="Angry" /&gt;&amp;nbsp; Also the Svchost was also using alot of Mem any idea
wat could cause this? Thnks&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Sorting desktop and server memories</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/35371/288746.aspx#288746</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 12:43:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:288746</guid><dc:creator>digitaldd</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Have you tried googling the brands and markings on the chips.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;for example: the chip has Infineon HYB39S256800CT-7.5 on the chips, putting that into google and clicking on some links will tell you that its a PC133 SDRAM chip 256MB CAS latency 3&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>DDR3 Memory Round-Up</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/35357/288086.aspx#288086</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 01:33:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:288086</guid><dc:creator>Marco C</dc:creator><description>&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri" size="3"&gt;Hello Everyone,&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri" size="3"&gt;We‘re writing to let you all know that we’ve just posted a new article at HotHardware in which we rounded up a handful of high-speed DDR3 memory kits.&amp;nbsp; We got our hands on five, dual-channel, 2GB kits from Corsair, Kingston (2), OCZ, and Super Talent each with different rated speeds and timings, ranging from 1333MHz to 1800MHz.&amp;nbsp; Our intent was to show you how performance is affected by different clock speeds and timings using Intel&amp;#39;s P35 chipset with a processor that has a 1333MHz front side bus speed.&amp;nbsp; Head on over to the site and take a look...&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal" style="MARGIN:0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri" size="3"&gt;Article URL: &lt;/font&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/DDR3_Memory_RoundUp_Corsair_Kingston_OCZ_Super_Talent"&gt;&lt;font face="Calibri" size="3"&gt;http://www.hothardware.com/Articles/DDR3_Memory_RoundUp_Corsair_Kingston_OCZ_Super_Talent&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Re: Enabling PAE in Windows? -- workaround for 32-bit OS's for more RAM support</title><link>http://hothardware.com/cs/forums/p/35319/287926.aspx#287926</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:21:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">ba4e517a-01ef-48a6-b096-821b95afe388:287926</guid><dc:creator>Marco C</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, the first thing you have to note is that PAE is only optimized for &amp;quot;server-class&amp;quot; versions of Windows.&amp;nbsp; With 32-bit, desktop versions of XP and Vista the limit is still 4GB, so there&amp;#39;s very little point in enabling PAE.&amp;nbsp; Is it dangerous to enable PAE?&amp;nbsp; Not realy, because you can disable it fairly easily even if you have a device with an imcompatible driver.&amp;nbsp; The worst case scenario may arise if you have your hard drives connected to a PCI controller card and its drivers have a problem and you end up corrupting data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I like to mess around with Windows and experiemnt as well, but you&amp;#39;ll be pretty board pretty quick with PAE I think.&amp;nbsp; All you have to do is add a switch to the boot.ini file and you&amp;#39;re done.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another thing that makes messing with PAE somewhat useless is that 64-bit versions of Windows are much more mature now, and there&amp;#39;s no need for PAE with a 64-bit version of Windows.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With that said, if you want to learn more about PAE and experiement, check out this page first:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEdrv.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system/platform/server/PAE/PAEdrv.mspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lots of information there, direct from the source.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>